A remarkable landmark went largely unnoticed last month when the world's 2 billionth cellphone user was connected. There are now 1,000 new users per minute buying phones around the world, according to trade body the GSM Association. But what makes this landmark so striking is not just the sheer number of users -- around one-third of the planet's population -- but that the 1 billion mark was only passed in 2004.
Nokia, the world's largest handset manufacturer, predicts that by 2015, 4 billion people will be using a mobile telephone. It is unlikely that any other technology has ever penetrated the global market so fast in history.
But such a rapid take-up has left us hardly any time to fully digest the pros and cons of living in a world where we can rarely escape these devices. The positives are easy to identify: faster responses to emergencies; a more democratic and fluid flow of information, particularly in developing nations where growth is at its strongest; reduced pollution through a suppressed need to travel.
However, the list of cited concerns is long -- almost too long to detail here.
Perhaps the most persistent are the health fears of being constantly exposed to the electromagnetic fields generated by cellphones and their base stations. For years now it seems we have lurched from the reassuring tones coming from the cellphone industry and numerous studies by governmental health bodies around the world, and the niggling uncertainties created by various scientific studies, such as one in 2004 by the Institute of Environmental Medicine at Sweden's Karolinska Institute that found that 10 years or more of cellphone use could increase the risk of acoustic neuroma, a rare and benign tumor of the cranial nerve that helps control hearing and balance.
We are now at the point where the mainstream consensus is that the balance of evidence suggests cellphones are safe to use, but that "more research is needed" and, as a precaution, children should not be needlessly exposed to phones. Hardly the most reassuring of caveats. Hence the constant fight by many parents and campaign groups such as MastSanity.org to stop the siting of base stations near schools.
The understandable fear, of course, is that the public are acting as guinea pigs for the further research that most agree is still needed.
In fact, children seem to be a constant factor when listing many of the other concerns associated with cellphones. Despite the health advisories and the industry's vow not to target children under 16 in its advertising, under-10s are the fastest growing segment of the UK market, according to phone consultancy Mobile Youth. It has predicted that by the end of this year a third of five-to-nine-year-olds will have a phone. But what benefits does this growth really bring?
Surely, this trend should be reversed. Children are five times more likely to be mugged for their phone as adults. Ringtones, gaming, texting and calls all add to ever increasing phone bills. And despite the industry's opt-in-only policy aimed at preventing the accidental targeting of children, they still have the means to access the many gambling and pornographic services now offered.
More obliquely, perhaps, children are among the most endangered by those users who persist selfishly in driving while holding a cellphone, despite it being outlawed [in the UK] in 2003.
The manufacture and disposal of cellphones, as with all electronica, has long been an issue. About five years ago, for example, there was a lot of fuss made about the use of "coltan" in cellphones. Columbite-tantalite is a heat-conducting mineral used in capacitors found in products including phones, games consoles, laptops and digital cameras.
The problem is that large reserves of coltan are found in the east of war-torn Democratic Republic of Congo. When the late 1990s dotcom boom caused prices to spike at US$600 a kilogram, local warlords were accused of directly profiting and buying arms from its sale. Furthermore, the mining of coltan threatened the area's already endangered gorilla population.
The international outcry led all the major phone manufacturers to issue assurances that they didn't source their capacitors from suppliers using Congolese coltan. In addition, the huge fall in coltan prices since has made other coltan-rich areas more attractive once more -- 50 percent of all coltan is now mined in western Australia. But without a cast-iron certification scheme to guarantee these claims, there is sadly still no way for consumers to know they are not complicit in this trade.
The status culture of cellphones, spurred on by the pressure to upgrade models whenever we renew or change network contracts -- we change our phones every 24.2 months on average in the UK -- has led to a huge volume of redundant phones entering the waste stream. This urge to upgrade must be resisted if this waste is to be reduced.
Thankfully, though, there have been efforts to address it with a number of recycling schemes. There are even ways to reduce the blight of phone chargers being habitually left plugged in. For example, Solio.com produce solar-powered chargers and for the strong-wristed wind-up chargers are also available.
An interesting paradox: despite all the issues raised by the increased use of cellphones, the leading industry players -- particularly Vodafone -- remain among the most popular stocks with ethical investment funds.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US