The news hasn't sunk in yet. French wine amateurs seem still oblivious. All they have been talking about these past few days is the extraordinary prices reached by 2005 primeur Bordeaux wines: US$447 for a bottle of Lafite Rothschild.
"Since Robert Parker came three months ago and gave unprecedented marks, such as 99/100, prices have gone through the ceiling," says Jean-Louis, a lover of Bordeaux, half worried, half ecstatic.
When I ask him whether he has heard of Mariann Fischer Boel, the EU commissioner for agriculture, and her wine reform, he replies: "No, should I know about it?"
Well, he might want to have a look at it. Her recommendations, if implemented, could change the face of the European wine industry forever. I doubt even she has realized the importance of what she has set in motion.
Lakes of wine
The EU faces an ever-growing surplus of wine and has reached its wits' end as to how to drain the overproduction. Recent trends show that Europeans are drinking less wine and when they do, they -- especially the British -- increasingly opt for New World wine. As a result, French wines, the bulk of European production, have lost markets. So wine growers will be paid to rip up their vines. Brussels wants to see one-eighth of European vineyards dug up. It certainly reads like a sensible cure.
Now, we come to the second part of the reform: "We want to simplify rules on wine-making practices and labelling ... in order to restore market balance and ... compete with dynamic New World producers."
What does this mean phrased undiplomatically? First, it means adopting New World wine labelling, considered simpler, therefore more accessible to consumers. "Simplified" means no more chateaux, no more domaines, no more appellation controlee, crus bourgeois, premiers crus and so on, but one single etiquette, with names of grape, country and year. I tell Jean-Louis.
My words are met with silence. Is he having a heart attack? A flow of furious invectives soon follows.
"But this is insane! It will never happen we'll never accept it. What a preposterous idea. Wines are made of different kinds of grapes, rarely just one. What matters is where it comes from and who produced it. I would never dream of offering my guests a glass of cabernet sauvignon it doesn't mean anything. If I ask, `Would you like a glass of Chateau Pape Clement?' they straight away know what I'm talking about. Simplify labelling? Bordeaux wines have the simplest labelling system in the world! There are 11,600 chateaux in Bordeaux and each produces one kind of wine: you like it or you don't. Easy, non?" he says.
Punching the product
And there's more to come. Simplifying rules on wine-making practices' means allowing "punching," a New World producers' habit which consists of adding sugar and wood to alter the taste and degree of alcohol in a wine. This practice is forbidden in France.
Jean-Louis is lost for words.
"I know about punching, of course. C 'est lamentable. Doctoring wine to make it more pleasing to the palate is like cosmetic surgery. At first, you're pleased with the result then comes the cruel moment of reckoning, when you know you've been had."
In Jonathan Nossiter's excellent documentary, Mondovino, we get a pretty good picture of what is at stake today in the wine industry.
On the one hand, New World winemakers produce simple wines, usually strong and fruity, the kind that make a very good first impression and almost immediately let you down. These "dynamic New World producers" as our Danish commissioner calls them, have a voracious and aggressive marketing strategy to match their products.
On the other hand, Old World winemakers, in the business for generations, are producing wine for all tastes and budgets. Their products are fallible, therefore less reliable than New World wines, because they are made by individuals, not corporations.
Besides, Old World winemakers don't take the consumers for stupid children. They rely on them to make a little extra effort and find their way to more complex and rewarding wines. What the EU's agriculture commissioner has, perhaps unknowingly, triggered is a debate on the choice of a civilization, no less.
Agnes Catherine Poirier is author of Touche: A French Woman's Take on the English.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US