Hydrogen -- one of the most abundant elements -- can be harnessed to produce energy because of its instability.
But that same quality, which helps it produce energy when it combines with oxygen, provides its greatest problem, since at high concentrations, it can explode, or suffocate a human being in an enclosed space, safety experts say.
Nonetheless, it is regarded as the perfect fuel, because its main byproduct is water instead of carbon emissions which are blamed for global warming.
And there are several hubs of international activity -- in Japan, Europe and California -- that are determined to prove the idea can work.
DaimlerChrysler, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota, Volkswagen, Ford and other auto manufacturers have all produced test vehicles powered by fuel cells.
General Motors' goal is to be the first automaker to sell 1 million fuel cell vehicles, according to a California initiative.
Symbolic of the huge technological challenges ahead, the California Fuel Cell Partnership (CFCP) -- which has less than 200 light duty fuel-celled vehicles on the roads in California -- has set a goal of only 300 to be placed in fleet demonstration projects.
CFCP is also promoting the development of hydrogen combustion engines, with the hopes of having 2,000 such vehicles on the roads by 2010.
California has already opened 22 hydrogen fuelling stations, with plans for another 15. CFCP is coordinating cooperation among all its 31 members, who include DaimlerChrysler, Ford, Hyundai, Nissan, Honda, Toyota and a number of fuel companies.
At the heart of many of the new vehicle developments is the Canadian-based Ballard Power Systems Inc, which has partnered with Mercedes-Benz to deploy 30 busses around Europe that are powered with 205 kilowatt engines. Mercedes Benz has a stake in the company, but Ballard has also produced fuel cells for other car makers.
The busses are undergoing a two-year field trial in London, Luxembourg, Hamburg, Barcelona, Amsterdam, Iceland, Stockholm, Stuttgart and Perth, Australia.
Ford has built fuel-cell-powered vehicles for the city of Vancouver, Canada. And Brazil's Sao Paulo, as well as Tokyo, Beijing and Mexico City are also planning to test fuel-cell vehicles in their public transport programs.
But Robert Rose, a founder of the Breakthrough Technologies Institute and a leading advocate for fuel cell technology, warned recently in the online Green Car journal of remaining "substantial challenges ahead."
When the need is great enough, he wrote, "people will find a way to make money providing [hydrogen], to do so safely and in a manner consistent with best environmental practise."
But he also pointed out the need for a new "man on the moon" style commitment from the government -- a sum much greater than the modest US$1.2-billion hydrogen fuel initiative launched by US President George W. Bush in 2003.
Rose dismissed as insufficient even a US$5.5 billion program for the US endorsed by 20 technical organizations in 2002.
"If we are going to break our energy addiction, we will need 10 times that amount -- US$50 billion to US$60 billion in the US and three to four times that worldwide -- over the next 15 years," he said.
In order to overcome hydrogen's volatility, engineers at the University of Florida at Gainesville are trying to figure out how to produce a tiny sensor device to detect hydrogen leaks and sound the alarm by wireless communication.
"You need lots of hydrogen sensors to detect leaks, but you don't want to have to maintain them or change the battery every couple of months," said Jenshan Lin, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering, in a recent research paper. "Our sensor can operate completely independently."
Lin has developed sensors as part of NASA's hydrogen research.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,