Faced with soaring oil prices, Indonesia and Malaysia are turning to biodiesel, a fuel that cuts regular diesel with vegetable oil, to reduce emissions and costly subsidies.
Indonesia has long searched for ways to reduce air pollution in Jakarta, one of the dirtiest cities in the world, and the government last month introduced biodiesel at gasoline stations in the capital.
"The air pollution in Jakarta is very terrible," said Amir, 35, a bus driver who was filling up at a Pertamina station in East Jakarta.
"I chose using biodiesel to support our government's planning and make the air in Jakarta fresher," he said.
"More than anything else the cost of biodiesel fuel is cheaper than [regular diesel]," he said, "so I can save money for my family."
While cost is the main motivator for most residents of the Indonesian capital, the alternative fuel was, in fact, only slightly cheaper than regular diesel during the weekend launch because it was being sold at gasoline stations owned by the government, which set the prices artificially low.
The high cost of substitutes is just one of the obstacles governments around the world face in making the move to alternative energies and weening their populations off a heavy dependence on fossil fuels.
Still not cheap
"The biggest impediment of biofuel popularization is its higher price than conventional fuel," Tomohide Sugino, a project leader for the UN's Center for Alleviation of Poverty through Secondary Crops' Development in Asia and the Pacific, wrote recently in a Jakarta Post opinion column.
"Roughly speaking, the production cost of biofuel is twice as much as gasoline," he wrote. "The forerunners who have successfully increased biofuel consumption have provided tax exemptions or subsidies to their biofuel producers."
Without these incentives, private companies have been hesitant to produce and sell biodiesel because of the relatively high cost of their most available substitute -- palm oil.
The uncertainty of supplies is another factor, despite the fact that Indonesia is second only to Malaysia in the production of crude palm oil.
Indonesia and Malaysia together control nearly 85 percent of the global production of crude palm oil, but demand for it has been risatile "wonder oil" has been used in goods ranging from margarine and soaps to lipstick and even napalm and is now found in an estimated one in 10 supermarket products.
"The prices of crude palm oil are rising, and export demand is increasing, so small and large palm-oil-producing companies are already making enough [money]," said Andrew Lim, a palm-oil-estate small holder.
"It isn't worth the risk right now to put in the capital for a biodiesel plant unless the government can make it worth our while," he added.
That's why the Indonesian government is looking at new ways to increase the production of palm oil and biodiesel for domestic use.
Research and Technology Minister Kusmayanto Kadiman said he had asked relevant ministries to develop a policy that would prioritize the production of palm oil for biodiesel use in Indonesia.
Kadiman said his ministry planned to build four biodiesel-processing plants in Indonesia that would together cost up to US$33 million, and to develop 500,000 hectares of plantations every year, with more than US$1 billion from the government.
Mandatory
The Malaysian government is taking similar steps and pledged last year to implement a national biofuel policy to reduce the country's dependence on crude oil and instead promote demand for palm oil as the key ingredient in biofuel production.
The policy calls for the mandatory use of biodiesel made of 5 percent processed palm oil with 95 percent petroleum diesel for all diesel vehicles from next year.
If the legislation is approved, the country would be the first in Asia to have such a policy.
"Malaysia's move toward biofuel can only benefit the country's palm-oil industry," said Sabri Ahmad, executive director of Golden Hope Plantations, a company involved in a government-sponsored pilot project to develop palm-oil biodiesel plants.
"If only 5 percent of palm oil is blended with diesel, a total of 500,000 tonnes of palm oil would be used for this purpose each year," he said. "This would translate into an extra 1 billion ringgit [US$270 million] in additional revenue."
However, the push for palm oil biofuel is worrisome for some environmental groups which charge that new plantations will destroy rainforests and habitat for such threatened Indonesian wildlife as orangutans, Sumatran tigers and rhinoceroses -- and also infringe on land used for local livelihoods.
"It's like they're going to solve one problem by creating another," said Rudy Lumuru, executive director of Sawit Watch. "They say biofuel is to minimize air pollution, but when they cut the forests, they create a new problem."
The government has shown some willingness to reform the palm-oil industry and use already-abandoned lands for planting instead of opening new ones. Officials are also looking to better substitutes for petrol-based fuel, such as jatropha, a cheaper source of vegetable oil that can be grown on dry, non-arable lands.
But with corruption still rampant, companies continue to clear forests that are often not even used afterward for palm oil. Large-scale development of jatropha and other alternative fuel sources would take years, adding to environmentalists' concerns.
"The government and the country see palm oil as one promising sector to develop," said Fitrian Ardiansyah, a program coordinator for the World Wildlife Fund. "We have to balance the demand for alternative fuels and economic growth of the country with environmental and social concerns."
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers