Tennessee Gock's discussion (Letters, June 9, page 8) on whether traditional or simplified Chinese is better makes me think of two men, in an age of cheap, accurate quartz watches, furiously arguing about which are better: sundials or hour-glasses. It may be that one is better than the other, but who cares, when much better alternatives exist?
Similarly, it may be, as Gock argues, that traditional characters are better than simplified characters (I suspect the difference is minor), but who cares?
Both are clearly worse than the alternatives -- alphabets and syllabaries.
Language evolved over millions of years as an exclusively oral skill. Writing is an artificial addition bolted onto language very recently. Biologically, language is oral, not visual, and writing systems that don't honor this oral basis will inevitably be difficult to use.
The further a writing system moves away from the sounds of a language, the more difficult it will be to learn. Chinese characters fail miserably in this regard.
Gock states that "Chinese writing (pictograms or ideograms) immediately conveys the meaning of each character." This is nonsense. If Chinese writing immediately conveyed the meaning of each character, then why do students in Taiwan spend so much time learning them? Why can't non-Chinese speakers (or, for that matter, illiterate Chinese speakers) immediately grasp the meaning of an arbitrary piece of Chinese text?
The reason is simple -- there is no inherent meaning in Chinese characters, any more than there is inherent meaning the in the squiggles that make up English words.
The meaning must be learned. And because the relationship in Chinese between the written symbol and the spoken word is so tenuous, learning this relationship is exceedingly difficult.
Other common arguments about why Chinese characters must be retained -- they're beautiful, they're needed to read ancient texts, they're needed to disambiguate the many homonyms in Chinese -- are equally spurious. In the interest of saving newsprint, I direct interested readers to John DeFrancis' excellent book The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy.
The real debate about Chinese characters is not whether simplified or traditional characters are better. It's about when they should be replaced altogether by a much simpler system, and what that system should be.
Unfortunately, the chances of that happening are slim, because people cling to that which is familiar, regardless of its utility. As Ni Haishu said, "Habit is a very irrational thing. The force of habit of a billion people is a force to be feared."
Brian Schack
Taipei
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past