Taiwan is a free and democratic country that respects human rights, while China is a country practising a system akin to slavery and trampling on human rights.
Because there is no chance of China transforming into a democracy practicing rule of law any time soon, spontaneous incidents of citizens protecting their rights and the Chinese government's suppression of these incidents will continue for a long time to come. Thus, I cannot but wonder what Taiwan, as the light of freedom and democracy shining closest to China, can do to improve China's human rights conditions.
First, the Taiwanese should seek to expose the Chinese government's human rights abuses to the international community and to all the people of China and urge them to take heed of the issue.
Cases of Chinese people protesting to protect their own rights occur all the time, although the Chinese government can easily crush these spontaneous and disorganized protests. It has become common for government officials, police and criminal gangs to collude with each other to suppress such protests.
Once the international community becomes aware of this type of action, Beijing simply "solves" the issue by removing a few low-ranking officials. The rest of the world's lack of understanding of this makes it easy for China to spin a web of deception.
On a recent trip to China, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was accompanied by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) throughout her visit and was allowed to meet Chen Guidi (陳桂棣) and Wu Chuntao (吳春桃), the authors of A Survey of Chinese Peasants (中國農民調查), to discuss human rights conditions in rural areas. This gave her the impression that the problem with human rights in China is that government policy does not reach rural areas.
It is vital that Taiwan drafts a political asylum law so that those persecuted by Beijing for participating in rights protection protests can be given sanctuary in Taiwan, this beacon of liberty.
China is the most tyrannical country in the world, while neighboring Taiwan is an emerging democracy. As such, Taiwan should grant asylum to those attempting to escape persecution in China for having participated in rights protection protests. Taiwan, however, has no political asylum law, so there is no legal foundation for offering these people political asylum.
I urge the Ministry of Interior Affairs, the Mainland Affairs Council, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to draft a political asylum law and submit it to the legislature as a way to display to the international community that Taiwan is paying close attention to China's human rights abuses.
Taiwan should ally itself with other free countries to end China's abuse of freedom and human rights.
The Chinese government's human rights abuses are serious. International capitalists, however, turn a blind eye to these violations to profit from China's cheap labor, and even help the Chinese government seize farmers' land and leak information to Beijing, resulting in the arrest of rights protection activists.
China has been made a member of the new UN Human Rights Council, which shows further tolerance and even encouragement of China's strengthened clampdown on human rights. As a democracy, Taiwan should hold firm on its stance and call on the international community to acknowledge the risk that China might expand its human rights clampdown to neighboring countries and maybe even the whole world, and how important it is to international security that China is not allowed to do so.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and a former special assistant to the late general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, Hu Yaobang (
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers