The snowballing Taiwan Development Corp (TDC) insider trading scandal forced President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to hold a meeting with high-level government and party officials on May 31, in which he promised to delegate power to Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) in accordance with the Constitution. However, the question of whether Su can really become the country's highest administrative official as specified in the Constitution deserves further scrutiny.
The key lies in how much power Chen is willing to cede. We must pay attention to the fact that in his announcement, Chen merely stressed that he would delegate powers outside those bestowed on the president by the Constitution to government and party officials, and let conflicts be negotiated and resolved through party and government mechanisms.
This does not mean that Su will enjoy complete decision-making rights for major national security policies. Unless the National Security Council under the Presidential Office ceases operations, Su will not be the country's highest administrative official, as Chen only delegated part of his power, not all of it.
Second, even if Chen were willing to delegate all of his powers to Su, the premier and his Cabinet would be working under the constant threat of having to resign en masse because the premier must step down when the president leaves his post, or after every legislative election.
From this perspective, if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is defeated in the year-end Taipei and Kaohsiung mayoral elections, or next year's legislative elections, it won't be just the party's chairman that will have to take political responsibility, but also the president and the premier. Therefore, even if Chen gives all his power to Su, the premier must be ready to leave at any time.
Not only that, but even if he were the country's highest administrative official as specified in the Constitution, Su would be but a minority leader without the support of the legislative majority.
To put it more bluntly, will the pan-blue-dominated legislature support Su if Chen delegates all power to him? Although we saw him shaking hands with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) on TV the other day, that does not mean that the pan-blue camp will stop boycotting Cabinet policies. If the pan-blue camp blocks his policies, he will find it difficult to become the country's highest administrative official.
In addition, since Chen's legitimacy as president is at a new low, he would only be drawing a constitutionally based pie in the sky if he was willing to make Su the nation's highest administrative official. This means that Su would not have legitimacy as a leader because, after all, his legitimacy comes from the president, whose own legitimacy is sorely lacking.
More importantly, in addition to having independent decision-making rights, the country's highest administrative official must also enjoy the full power to form a Cabinet, according to the intention of Article 53 of the Constitution. The article clearly states: "The Executive Yuan shall be the highest administrative organ of the state." But if Su cannot or dares not form a new Cabinet immediately in order to gain control of government personnel, then he is not the highest administrative official.
To be honest, Chen's delegation of power is only partial, as he is likely to only transfer political and party powers not specified in the Constitution. He plans to let DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun decide party affairs alone or jointly with the party's Central Standing Committee. They will also have to take charge of the year-end mayoral elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung. This means that if the DPP truly suffers a miserable defeat, then Chen has set a "stop-loss point" for himself. He will not have to step down to take responsibility for the results, because Yu and the committee will become scapegoats. In government affairs, he still has the right to appoint or dismiss the premier and decide major national security policies. In contrast, Su, from this moment, must take responsibility for the success or failure of Taiwan's domestic and economic affairs.
Generally speaking, Su is still not the highest administrative official as specified in the Constitution. But in the wake of Chen's decision to delegate powers, Su and Yu have gained some bargaining chips for when it comes time to decide who will become the party's candidate in the 2008 presidential election. If the DPP is defeated in both Taipei and Kaohsiung at the end of this year, Su will obtain the pan-green camp's only ticket to the presidential election, and Yu will be out.
However, Su also faces some political risks: If Chen resigns, Vice President Annette Lu (
Based on the above reasoning, we must ask ourselves if Su is the nation's highest administrative official.
Chen Chao-chien is an assistant professor in the department of public affairs at Ming Chuan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers