Former US secretary of state Madeleine Albright describes the current international stand-off between the US and Iran as a "battle of ideas." And on the evidence of recent weeks, it is a battle the administration of US President George W. Bush is losing. It needs urgently to raise its game or risk being out-maneuvered by Tehran.
Albright made her comment after a White House meeting of former US secretaries of state and defense, convened by Bush in order to tap their collective wisdom on issues such as Iran and Iraq. She advised that a senior administration figure, possibly Bush himself, should make a speech clarifying US policy objectives concerning Iran, and not just those related to its nuclear activities.
Like a growing number of prominent Democrats and Republicans in Washington, Albright believes the US should hold its nose and talk directly to Tehran about all issues of mutual concern. As long as it refuses to do so, these pragmatists argue, it will find it all but impossible to convince other countries to back US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's proposed "coalition of the willing."
US political luminaries such as Richard Lugar, Republican chairman of the Senate foreign relations committee, and John McCain, the 2008 Republican presidential hopeful, have also publicly questioned the Bush administration's tactics. They suggest that international opinion will simply not understand a continuing US refusal to engage in face-to-face diplomacy when the stakes are so high.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan drove home this point at the weekend, suggesting that Washington's refusal to get involved in EU-Iran negotiations conducted by Britain, France and Germany was actually undermining international efforts to persuade Iran to comply with UN Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) demands.
"I have stated very clearly both in private in my contacts with the American administration and publicly that I think it is important that the US comes to the table and that it should join the European countries and Iran to find a solution," Annan said.
While the US frets over tactics and ponders its next move, Iran has been busily exploiting its advantage. Its first success came, in absentia, in the Security Council, when it became clear that Russia and China were ready to block a new resolution threatening sanctions against Iran on the nuclear issue.
US and British diplomats had been suggesting that Moscow, in particular, would come on board when push came to shove -- or would be content to abstain in any vote. That proved not to be the case, and so the resolution has been shelved pending preparation of a revamped incentives package for Iran by the EU-Three (subject of course to US approval).
The latest plan, borrowed from Marlon Brando's "Godfather" character, is to make Tehran an offer it can't refuse. What officials are calling a "very attractive package" could include political and economic carrots such as help with nuclear power station construction. The bottom line remains Iran's abandonment of its potentially bomb-related uranium enrichment activities.
But even this could be fudged if Tehran agreed, for example, to confine enrichment activities to research programs conducted under strict IAEA scrutiny and safeguards. This outcome has been privately floated by Mohammad ElBaradei, the IAEA chief. The package was expected to be finalized at a meeting of the Security Council permanent five members plus Germany in London at the end of last week.
Strike two for Iran came with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's internationally publicized letter to Bush. It was true, as the Americans were quick to point out, that the letter contained no substantive proposals on the nuclear or any other issues. But what Washington missed, in its initial, dismissive reaction, was the symbolic importance of this first public missive from Tehran since the 1979 revolution and subsequent rupture with the US.
The letter made Ahmadinejad, who was demonized by Western governments following his anti-Israeli statements and apparent attempts to deny the Holocaust, look like a more human figure who was seeking, however clumsily, to avoid a confrontation. The letter's flat rejection made Washington look like an aggressor, thereby undermining sympathy for its cause.
That impression was only reinforced in the course of Tehran's third public relations success in a week -- Ahmadinejad's visit to Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, for a summit meeting of the D-8 (as opposed to the G8) -- a group of principally Islamic countries espousing joint development goals. The group backed Iran's right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and called on the US and its allies to more forcefully pursue a diplomatic solution.
Ahmadinejad told the summit Iran was ready to talk to anybody (except Israel); and would do so unconditionally, but not under the threat of force.
"We are ready to hold dialogue with all countries of the world," he said.
During his Indonesian visit, the Iranian leader was greeted as a sort of modern-day Muslim hero and cheered by admiring crowds. It was reminiscent of the sort of reception once accorded to the late chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization, Yasser Arafat.
And it bodes ill for the US and Western public diplomacy efforts in the Islamic sphere.
Ahmadinejad has made many mistakes since becoming president last year. But he is showing signs of learning. And as Albright suggested, Iran appears to be winning the battle of ideas.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
RSS