Whether to allow direct cross-strait flights is an issue that impacts heavily on the prosperity of the public and the security of the nation. The possibility of the legislature amending the Statute Governing the Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (
To begin with, the economic downside of direct flights is a matter of grave concern. Many think that direct flights will further encourage capital outflows to China, pushing up domestic unemployment and increasing the country's reliance on the Chinese market -- all of which will strengthen China's position in relation to Taiwan.
Also, even if the establishment of direct flights is inevitable, the government should first put in place certain risk management measures. In addressing such a polarizing issue that is intimately tied to national interests, a mature democracy should seek to transcend partisan politics. Minority and majority parties must reach a consensus through cross-party negotiations; the ultimate decision should not simply be forced through by a majority in the legislature.
Allowing for direct flights entails air traffic control rights, ports of arrival and departure, quarantine and other issues that must be resolved via bilateral consultations. If the legislature were to suddenly open up cross-strait flights without the necessary preparations, Taiwan would lose much needed leverage in any negotiation with China, and the management of the nation's air and sea ports would be severely compromised.
Conducting negotiations on cross-strait flights falls within the president's jurisdiction and while the president must respect the opinion of the legislature, the final decision in this case is President Chen Shui-bian's (
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng's (
The truth is, delays in establishing cross-strait flights are mainly due to the fact that Beijing refuses to negotiate with Taiwan. Taiwan has already suggested the two sides introduce cross-strait cargo flights, but Beijing has refused to cooperate. Taiwan has revised the Statute Governing the Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, and is ready to apply the liaison model used earlier between Taiwan and Hong Kong, with private groups conducting the negotiations.
However, Beijing has insisted that Taiwan first accept the "1992 consensus" and the "one China principle" before entering into negotiations, which has deadlocked discussion. What the pan-blues and pan-greens should be doing at this stage is joining forces and exerting pressure on China together, not helping China to oppress their own government.
The New York-based Freedom House ranks Taiwan as Asia's most democratic country -- an evaluation that the Taiwanese people should be proud of. But vicious partisan squabbling is not the kind of democracy that we desire nor deserve.
The pan-blues and pan-greens must shed their prejudices for there to be any hope of improving the nation's current state of affairs. Otherwise, all of our successes as a democracy and market economy will slowly fade away.
Lin Wen-cheng is a professor in the Institute of Mainland China Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University, and is a member of the Taipei Society.
TRANSLATED BY MAX HIRSCH
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past