The controversy over President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chen's staff argued that the transit proposal suggested by the administration of US President George W. Bush was unacceptable because it failed to treat the democratically elected president of Taiwan with respect, and the delegation therefore preferred to search for an alternative arrangement.
The government, however, should refrain from engaging in political rhetoric with the US and should use diplomacy to straighten things out.
The statement released by Chen's staff that "Taiwan would become the son of the United States if we accepted the transit arrangement" was inappropriate and will not help in mending fences.
The timing and context of Chen's transit has become a litmus test of US-Taiwan relations, given that Chinese President Hu Jintao (
According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the White House insisted on its original proposal, which restricted Chen's transit to outside the mainland US. The government considered this to be unfriendly and even humiliating. As such, the foreign ministry needed a contingency plan for Chen's transit stop. But both sides failed to minimize the impact of the issues that have politicized US-Taiwan relations.
Earlier this year, Chen's move to mothball the National Unification Council (NUC) and its guidelines angered Washington, because Taipei landed it with another "surprise."
Some predicted that the Bush administration might use the Chinese leader's visit to punish Chen. Taipei should recognize that Bush did not condemn the NUC decision during his meeting with Hu.
Relations between Taipei and Washington have gone through ups and downs recently, and there is room for better communication and understanding. Even Chen, when he met with the new director of the American Institute in Taiwan, Steven Young, emphasized several times that there would be no more "surprises."
Another concern of Washington's decision-makers is that as an open, transparent democracy, the US expects more from Taiwan. Washington supports Chen's administration because he is a democratically elected leader. But Beijing profoundly distrusts Chen.
While it is essential for leaders in Taipei and Washington to improve communication and mutual trust, and avoid adding unpredictability to the relationship, it is also important for Taiwan to earn more respect and fair treatment from the US, regardless of China's influence. Nevertheless, the effort on Taiwan's side has not been good enough.
The Bush administration also must avoid incorporating a double standard in its treatment of Taiwan in the course of engaging with Beijing. Bush should contemplate the degree to which his administration can keep a balance between safeguarding US interests and those of a democratic Taiwan, while at the same time engaging China and trying to mold it into a responsible stakeholder.
Looking ahead, Taipei should communicate more with Washington, while Washington should encourage Taiwan's efforts to establish good governance and political institutionalization.
Liu kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the