President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has transited through the US on each of his past visits to Latin America. His most recent journey to Paraguay, however, came in the wake of the changes to the National Unification Council and guidelines, and the visits to the US by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). The transit issue was therefore especially sensitive.
Before Chen's departure, observers were dizzied by the constantly changing information regarding the location and mode of the transit. In the end, Chen broke with tradition and chose to stop in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
The US is trying to sell arms to Taiwan at extremely high prices so that Taiwan can handle its enemies. Taiwan, however, has only ever had one enemy: China. And while the US is not telling China to withdraw the missiles it has aimed at Taiwan, it is attempting to stop the Taiwanese from launching a referendum to decide their own future.
For the sake of maintaining its dominant position in the UN, it has now even yielded to China by embarrassing Chen. To Washington's surprise, Chen steeled himself and chose not to transit through the US.
While the pan-blue camp laughed at the pan-green camp's misfortune and demanded that Chen apologize for humiliating the nation, it became apparent that the visits to the UAE by Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (黃志芳), Minister of Transportation and Communications Kuo Yao-chi (郭瑤琪) and their families not long ago -- which drew strong criticism -- were actually a diplomatic achievement disguised as a holiday trip, as was demonstrated by Chen's transit through Abu Dhabi.
This means the transit through the UAE was the successful implementation of Plan B, and not a mistake resulting from panic, as the pan-blue camp claimed.
We are positively surprised by Chen's maturing diplomatic strategies and want to ask the pan-blue camp to offer a public apology for their fictitious claims of Chen's confused odyssey.
More significantly, Chen decided that he would no longer endure humiliations and orders from the US. The greatest pride of Americans -- their belief in freedom and democracy -- is a complex issue, and their pride at times is somewhat misplaced. In particular, situations where the US' economic interests conflict with its belief in justice are a problem for the US.
Taiwan and the US are two independent countries with their own respective national interests. When these overlap, the two can cooperate, but when they conflict, Taiwan must not hesitate to follow its own path.
Chen is adopting the style he used during his term as Taipei mayor. Taiwan's diplomatic problems are not of his doing, but it takes considerable intelligence to resolve them while upholding the nation's dignity.
We were glad to see Chen's brave and resourceful display. The performance was also a signal to anyone with ambitions to lead the nation in future: They must manifest the will to lead Taiwan down its own path to win public respect and support.
Chen Gau-tzu is deputy director of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US