The question of Taiwan's responsibility for last week's rioting in the Solomon Islands is an important one and worthy of investigation. It would be prudent for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) to grill its ambassador in Honiara, Antonio Chen (
If hearsay in the international press is to be believed, however, MOFA itself is the cause of the conflict. Loads of cash, so the theory goes, was sent to Snyder Rini to ensure his election as prime minister, meaning his rivals could not switch Honiara's allegiance to Beijing. The theory, however, is based in the perceptions of a destructive mob that couldn't tell the difference between Chinese, Taiwanese and Solomon Islanders of Chinese descent.
It's one thing for the press to speculate on the causes of the unrest; it's another for governments to level accusations at Taipei without providing any evidence, which is exactly what Australian Prime Minister John Howard, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer, Justice Minister Chris Ellison and New Zealand Defense Minister Phil Goff have done.
Admittedly, criticism from New Zealand -- which is more grounded in Austronesian culture than Australia, and whose government has ministers prepared to publicly support Taiwan -- has resonance. And "dollar diplomacy" is a distasteful and corrosive problem. Yet it will be hard to stamp out as long as China blocks Taiwan from entering into diplomatic relations with who it chooses. That is the reality.
But criticism from Australia is laughable. Howard and Downer, dealers in "evidence" of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, ought to furnish proof of Taipei's mischief, or else their accusations can be assumed to have motives other than improving fraternity with Melanesia. Canberra's scapegoating has obscured its own astounding inability to predict and -- through Australian-led peacekeepers -- contain unrest stemming from widespread dissatisfaction with the winning candidate.
On Wednesday, in the presence of Chinese Ambassador to Australia Fu Ying (
If Fu took the slightest notice of Downer, it wasn't apparent the next day, when Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang (
Before Canberra scolds Taipei for its South Pacific maneuvering, it would do well to reflect on its own conduct in relation to Papua New Guinea (endless aid to what effect?), East Timor (where Downer's lust for oil trumped civility toward a battered new nation) and most notoriously Nauru, where a hopeless government was bought off with at least 20 million Aussie-minted "diplomacy dollars" to detain bona fide asylum seekers.
For strategic and moral reasons, MOFA must ground its relations with other countries in things more enduring and conspicuous than gifts of cash. But "dollar diplomacy," even if implicated in this instance, is marginal in explaining the Solomon Islands' predicament.
Australia knows this, but does not say so. Its behavior again displays contempt for Taiwan, denial of its own weaknesses in the region and the dismissal of the benefits that Taipei delivers to its allies.
So why has Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers