Plans were first laid to return the beaver to Scotland 10 years ago. But after a decade of public consultation, scientific studies, political wrangling and internecine warfare between government agencies, the attempt to reintroduce the rodent back to the Highlands was ditched last year. It proved to be one of the nation's longest, costliest and least successful reintroduction projects ever.
While the beaver was busy getting nowhere in Scotland, 26 other countries -- including Denmark and Bosnia -- were welcoming it back. Rumours are circulating at the moment that Wales will put itself forward as the most likely candidate to reintroduce beavers into Britain.
Why does the UK appear to be so set against such reintroductions? It is often said that because the beaver and many other species disappeared from these islands hundreds of years ago, they have slipped from our consciousness. Attempts to reintroduce them today seem to be a case of pushing alien creatures onto an alien landscape. Beavers, lynx, elk and wolves just would not fit.
Yet all across Europe, countries are reversing centuries of persecuting wild animals and either encouraging or reintroducing species they once forced to the brink of extinction.
Despite the cold shoulder given to the beaver, advocates for a wilder Britain take heart from the story of wild boar. These once native hairy pigs had been missing for centuries. But after a series of escapes from commercial farms, they have reintroduced themselves without any assistance. Now they are being cautiously welcomed as an important ecological component of these islands.
Polecats are a similar story. From their refuges in western Britain, they slipped out under cover of darkness and began expanding populations throughout England.
Removing persecution has meant the return of buzzards and ravens but attitudes to larger mammals are still fraught with anxiety. The problem seems to lie in the power of a tiny minority of landowners and government officials who see creatures such as the beaver as ambassadors for a wilder, more ecologically dynamic world, against which they have fought for generations.
Wild animals are always fought over; in Britain today there are battles raging over foxes, badgers, squirrels, ducks, whales and deer. But beavers, lynx, wolf and other creatures that became extinct in Britain are now part of a wider philosophical debate.
Binging back the beaver is no longer about just adding another name to the menu of British wildlife, even though EU legislation requires member states to at least attempt to reintroduce native species where feasible. Increasingly, reintroductions are about ecological restoration on a large scale. There has been a paradigm shift in conservation, and with it a growing desire for more wild lands -- or "rewilding."
According to the ecologist and reintroduction specialist Derek Gow, animals such as the beaver could "be brought back to Britain tomorrow."
"They prefer small tributaries and streams about two to three metres wide, which they dam with trees and branches to create small pools -- beavers do not like to travel far from the safety of open water. Their activity results in an astounding ecology, a mosaic of habitats of pools, meadows and willow coppice which are ideal for a huge range of wildlife," Gow says. They do not need wilderness, either.
"In Europe now there are thousands of beavers living in modern landscapes," Gow says.
Germany's experience with beavers should give some heart to UK ecologists. During the late 1970s, 120 animals were reintroduced there; now there are some 8,000 and room for three times that amount. Gerhard Schwab, an ecologist and beaver manager, says they are changing the landscape for the better.
"They are most effective at landscape change, creating new habitats and species richness. Because of them, wildlife such as kingfishers, otters, dragonflies and the rare black stork have returned. Fishermen have welcomed the beavers because the pools they make have increased fish density by 80 percent," Schwab says.
In France, the beaver has been found to improve water flow. Bryony Coles, professor of prehistoric archaeology at the University of Exeter, has researched the beavers in their landscape.
"In Brittany, in a modern landscape, [through dam building] beavers hold more than six times the amount of water that flows down the streams or rivers. In the more hilly terrain of southeast France it is far greater than that," she says.
As the UK approaches what could be the driest year in a century, perhaps the beaver will become a more appealing prospect to those considering how to manage Britian's landscapes. Although there are some beavers in the country, in enclosed areas and wildlife parks, the real challenge is to release them into river catchments and allow them to do their thing.
In contrast with the scrupulously researched but failed Scottish reintroduction, many beavers have successfully returned to parts of Europe with little more effort than being booted out of the back of a van. When beavers are left to their own devices, their devices are considerable, but an old enmity remains in Britain towards wild animals roaming the countryside and changing the surroundings.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US