Plans were first laid to return the beaver to Scotland 10 years ago. But after a decade of public consultation, scientific studies, political wrangling and internecine warfare between government agencies, the attempt to reintroduce the rodent back to the Highlands was ditched last year. It proved to be one of the nation's longest, costliest and least successful reintroduction projects ever.
While the beaver was busy getting nowhere in Scotland, 26 other countries -- including Denmark and Bosnia -- were welcoming it back. Rumours are circulating at the moment that Wales will put itself forward as the most likely candidate to reintroduce beavers into Britain.
Why does the UK appear to be so set against such reintroductions? It is often said that because the beaver and many other species disappeared from these islands hundreds of years ago, they have slipped from our consciousness. Attempts to reintroduce them today seem to be a case of pushing alien creatures onto an alien landscape. Beavers, lynx, elk and wolves just would not fit.
Yet all across Europe, countries are reversing centuries of persecuting wild animals and either encouraging or reintroducing species they once forced to the brink of extinction.
Despite the cold shoulder given to the beaver, advocates for a wilder Britain take heart from the story of wild boar. These once native hairy pigs had been missing for centuries. But after a series of escapes from commercial farms, they have reintroduced themselves without any assistance. Now they are being cautiously welcomed as an important ecological component of these islands.
Polecats are a similar story. From their refuges in western Britain, they slipped out under cover of darkness and began expanding populations throughout England.
Removing persecution has meant the return of buzzards and ravens but attitudes to larger mammals are still fraught with anxiety. The problem seems to lie in the power of a tiny minority of landowners and government officials who see creatures such as the beaver as ambassadors for a wilder, more ecologically dynamic world, against which they have fought for generations.
Wild animals are always fought over; in Britain today there are battles raging over foxes, badgers, squirrels, ducks, whales and deer. But beavers, lynx, wolf and other creatures that became extinct in Britain are now part of a wider philosophical debate.
Binging back the beaver is no longer about just adding another name to the menu of British wildlife, even though EU legislation requires member states to at least attempt to reintroduce native species where feasible. Increasingly, reintroductions are about ecological restoration on a large scale. There has been a paradigm shift in conservation, and with it a growing desire for more wild lands -- or "rewilding."
According to the ecologist and reintroduction specialist Derek Gow, animals such as the beaver could "be brought back to Britain tomorrow."
"They prefer small tributaries and streams about two to three metres wide, which they dam with trees and branches to create small pools -- beavers do not like to travel far from the safety of open water. Their activity results in an astounding ecology, a mosaic of habitats of pools, meadows and willow coppice which are ideal for a huge range of wildlife," Gow says. They do not need wilderness, either.
"In Europe now there are thousands of beavers living in modern landscapes," Gow says.
Germany's experience with beavers should give some heart to UK ecologists. During the late 1970s, 120 animals were reintroduced there; now there are some 8,000 and room for three times that amount. Gerhard Schwab, an ecologist and beaver manager, says they are changing the landscape for the better.
"They are most effective at landscape change, creating new habitats and species richness. Because of them, wildlife such as kingfishers, otters, dragonflies and the rare black stork have returned. Fishermen have welcomed the beavers because the pools they make have increased fish density by 80 percent," Schwab says.
In France, the beaver has been found to improve water flow. Bryony Coles, professor of prehistoric archaeology at the University of Exeter, has researched the beavers in their landscape.
"In Brittany, in a modern landscape, [through dam building] beavers hold more than six times the amount of water that flows down the streams or rivers. In the more hilly terrain of southeast France it is far greater than that," she says.
As the UK approaches what could be the driest year in a century, perhaps the beaver will become a more appealing prospect to those considering how to manage Britian's landscapes. Although there are some beavers in the country, in enclosed areas and wildlife parks, the real challenge is to release them into river catchments and allow them to do their thing.
In contrast with the scrupulously researched but failed Scottish reintroduction, many beavers have successfully returned to parts of Europe with little more effort than being booted out of the back of a van. When beavers are left to their own devices, their devices are considerable, but an old enmity remains in Britain towards wild animals roaming the countryside and changing the surroundings.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers