My readers may find this difficult to believe, but there was a time a few decades ago when I wasn't very welcome around the offices of a certain newspaper where I worked as an investigative reporter.
At first I thought this was because I would go straight for the jugular and lecture the other reporters, editors and everyone else on how to do their jobs properly. But it turned out that it was mostly because management were concerned about the welfare of the female staff.
Now I have to confess that before my gal Cathy Pacific entered the equation I was known as something of a ladies' man, so I grudgingly understood the management's attitude. And although it was not true (as long rumored) that the reporting staff of that paper was entirely female, it was close enough to the truth for management to institute a "Say No! No! No! to Johnny" policy, a slogan they circulated in English, no less.
One of my colleagues at the newspaper at that time was [Editor's note: name withheld], who got smart and eventually moved to where the money was -- consultancies, including spells with the less-than-capable but more-than-remunerative propaganda teams at the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party, as well as advertising campaigns with a number of global sportswear firms with local interests.
So imagine my reaction when I discovered that one of my former colleague's later efforts on behalf of Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) -- "Retransform Formosa, Taiwan, Go! Go! Go!" -- was so similar to the slogan that struck terror into my lady colleagues that I wonder whether he wasn't thinking of me. Was he getting nostalgic for the days I got him smashed after work and introduced him to ladies like "Bluebell" Lan Ling-ling (藍玲玲), now deceased?
Rest, Bluebell my dear, rest.
But back to my former colleague. I must catch up with the old fellow and see if he's been plundering my CV for inspiration, though knowing him, he'll plead coincidence.
"Coincidence"? In this town, there's no such thing.
For most men of my vintage, serious sexual experience began during military service with some very overworked ladies much older than us. But it was a struggle in that environment. As an old martial ditty, one might hope that San Min Chu Yi (Three Principles of the People) would fill your average soldier with the desire to dress up and parade in front of the girls in the hope of some action. For mine, though, the Republic of China's national anthem was a dirge for aficionados of Tai Chi goose-stepping; it was the musical anti-Viagra of its era. But that was OK; there were other sources of invigoration. Some other time I'll fill you in on some of my adventures in the service of the nation -- and not just at the infamous "Vivien's Retreat" bar and special services emporium on Kinmen.
It was while I was reflecting on the fine-tuned skills required for olde-style seduction -- and the privacy that most of us enjoyed as we went about our business -- that I reflected on the pathetic spectacle presented by the downfall of Grand Justice Cheng Chung-mo (
You all know the story: Cheng takes an allegedly sick and definitely cute law professor half his age to a motel to recover, all the while being snapped by an intrepid Apple Daily photographer (Apple Daily, "Grand justice takes woman to motel," April 5, page 1).
Whether Cheng really was on his hands and knees cleaning up after his companion's gastro or instead teaching her the finer points of forensics law, I'm not convinced that we really needed to know about all of this. I don't see what it has to do with Cheng's capacity to do his job, but I see very clearly what this has to do with that newspaper raking in shitloads of cash.
But hang on for a moment. No one has noted that one of the reporters on the case was Hsieh Chung-liang (
And Cheng, of course, was the grand justice accused by scallywag former legislator Su Ying-kuei (
That's some of the background. And I, like any half-assed journalist in this town, have been around long enough to know that things don't happen by accident.
These reporters were tipped off by Cheng's enemies of formidable standing, or else instructed by their superiors to get the judge. Given how much infidelity and how many dysfunctional families there are around the place, it is intriguing that the Apple Daily should choose this particular target. Who wanted one of the most senior judges in the land to fall, and why? Key questions, but you won't get the answers from the Apple Daily.
In the meantime, I'll give Hsieh Chung-liang, co-author Chu Ming (
When I was in Europe in the 1970s, some friends introduced me to a strange man called Dusan Makavejev. I visited the set of one of his movies about a Sigmund Freud-trained psychiatrist called Wilhelm Reich -- though I never saw the thing because it was banned here (an erect penis juxtaposed against the image of a dictator was judged unacceptable; presumably for insulting the dictator). But, inspired by his subject, Makavejev did say one thing that I've never forgotten: something along the lines of: "Politics is for people who can't have a satisfying orgasm."
Add "tabloid journalism" to "politics," dear reader, and you'll find no greater wisdom.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS