"Where does Taiwan go from here?" That's the question in the minds of many anxious observers in view of the growing absurdities of the nation's politics.
According to the Constitution, Taiwan is ruled by a government composed of five branches. But a look at the problems in each of those branches reveals a government structure in the process of being sabotaged -- to the point of causing anyone who cares about this nation to suffer sleepless nights.
The Executive Yuan has had most of its proposals boycotted by the opposition-controlled Legislative Yuan. The legislature has also blocked the plan of the Examination Yuan, which is in charge of administering civil service examinations, to scrap the 18 percent preferential interest rate for retired teachers, public servants and military personnel.
Then there's the Judicial Yuan. On Tuesday the public witnessed the legislature block Hsieh Wen-ding (
The Control Yuan has been almost completely forgotten. The body empowered by the Constitution to monitor public officials has seen its backlog of public complaints grow ever larger as the pan-blue camp adamantly and repeatedly refuses to review the body's nominations in the legislature's Procedure Committee.
The primary responsibility of legislators is to make laws in the nation's interest. But judging from their recent soap-opera-like performances, it seems as if their power has swelled so much that they think they can act like judges and paralyze the government.
Forget Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (
With former KMT chairman Lien Chan's (
But the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration isn't innocent of blame, either. Going on to its seventh year in office, the DPP administration has not learned from its mistakes or refined its governing skills. Instead, with the party plagued by a spate of scandals, many wonder whether the party has lost its ideals and become like the corrupt KMT regime it used to fight. How many of his promises to safeguard the country's social fairness and justice has Chen made good on?
In a bid to reverse its sinking approval ratings, the Presidential Office last night held a joint meeting with senior officials from the Executive Yuan and the DPP. One hopes the result of this meeting won't be just another round of rhetoric.
As author Mark Clement once said: "Leaders who win the respect of others are the ones who deliver more than they promise, not the ones who promise more than they can deliver."
There is no doubt that Chen and the DPP need to search their hearts and work to regain the public's trust before it is too late.
"Where does Taiwan go from here?" That's a question that should be pondered by everyone -- and especially those in the Presidential Office.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers