Cheng Chung-mo's (
At least that is the sincere hope of those of us who are getting worn down by the around-the-clock sensational media coverage of the story. However, among all the gossip and hearsay disguised by the media as "serious news" in this latest saga, there has been insufficient discussion of why Cheng should step down.
If the real justification for demanding Cheng's resignation isn't stressed, the point of his departure would seem to be lost in the tide of useless information the media is feeding the public about the story.
Without question, Cheng's decision to step down was the right one and absolutely necessary. When the local Chinese-language media initially published pictures of him entering the motel with a young woman, if he had immediately declared his decision to resign, it would have been the correct choice. Waiting a few days before finally succumbing to public pressure diminishes Cheng's standing.
Cheng had to resign because he had tarnished the credibility and the image of the Counsel of Grand Justices, as well as the Judicial Yuan vice. Had he remained in his posts, the tasteless jokes and speculation would have lingered on, diminishing the image of the institutions. The damage to the trustworthiness of these two institutions, which are supposed to be embodiments of law and justice, would be too great.
Even if Cheng was telling the truth, and that the woman was indeed suffering a stomach ache and needed to use the bathroom of the motel, he should still resign. Entering a motel room with a young woman alone by itself is highly improper precisely because it raises too much speculation about the real reason behind the act.
Having said that, it should be pointed out that there were no real legal grounds to ask Cheng to resign. Entering a motel room with a woman is not illegal and nothing else can be proved to have happened. In the absence of legal reasons, Cheng's resignation was a moral and ethical issue -- that is, he had sufficient conscience to save the Council of Grand Justices and the Judicial Yuan vice from further public mockery. Chen's resignation was an act of self-sacrifice in this regard. From a member of the Council of Grand Justices, people rightfully demand higher moral and ethical standards.
Cheng's resignation should end the controversy. He and the woman in question should be left alone. Whatever their relationship, it is strictly private and a personal matter of the parties involved.
Unfortunately, there are some members of the Legislative Yuan who seem to be having far too much fun with the whole issue and don't want it to end too soon. Some of them are even saying that there should be an investigation into whether Cheng told the truth and into the exact nature of the relationship between Cheng and the woman. That would be taking things too far. One cannot help but ask why the Legislative Yuan does not demand of itself half of what it demands from Cheng.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has