It doesn't take much in most societies for people to rely on stereotypes to judge other cultures or peoples. This is especially the case in societies that are relatively homogeneous -- as is the case with Taiwan, which, no matter how one categorizes its ethnic groups, is largely Han.
A lack of consensus over identity allows Taiwanese to describe themselves in a number of ways in relation to each other and to their neighboring countries. Some people call themselves "Chinese" and some "Taiwanese." Others use a variety of expressions to explain how they perceive themselves as part of a greater whole.
Unfortunately, the flexibility that the Han majority are able to exercise with regard to their identities turns into stiff inflexibility when they meet "Others."
It is necessary to use the term "Others" to refer to groups who lack any identifiable shared trait, except that they are not Han.
In Taiwan, the group "Others" includes Aborigines who are born and raised in this country; Thai laborers who have come here to work at manual labor that most Taiwanese would refuse to do, and for wages that most Taiwanese would never accept; Vietnamese and other Southeast Asian women who have married Taiwanese; Filipina caregivers and housemaids; and the children of "mixed" couples, who are not so easy to pigeonhole. In short, this group includes everyone who does not fit into the Han chauvinist's idea of racial homogeneity.
There is no question that Taiwan is a tolerant place. Still, there are enough instances of obvious bigotry that one begins to notice a broader trend of chauvinism.
Examine a few recent examples: First, the case of the Thai laborers working on the Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit project. It is clear that the people who employed them and who were charged with their care felt little obligation to treat them as worthy of respect and possessing legal and moral rights. The workers were treated as chattel, subjected to appalling living conditions and had their freedoms curtailed, while their employers counted their loot on the way to the bank.
After the workers rioted over their treatment, the company decided to sue the "ringleaders" for huge sums of money which they had no hope of paying off. Only after an intensive media campaign highlighted this injustice did the company back down.
Is it naive to believe that racism played no role in this entire situation? Would the company have tried the same thing with Taiwanese workers? Never.
And earlier this week, Taiwan Solidarity Union Legislator Liao Pen-yan (
Was his sudden concern prompted by prejudice? Why didn't he warn Taiwanese married to Chinese to get health checks? China is no ecological paradise, after all.
The good news is that many social groups are not afraid to speak out against discrimination.
But what is sad is how rare it is for a major political figure to speak out against such things. After the Thai laborers rioted, did President Chen Shui-bian (
Think of the impact on racism had, for instance, Chen and Ma made a joint statement deploring the workers' treatment and calling for stronger enforcement of the rights of all foreign workers.
But our leaders are, of course, too busy fighting each other to actually lead, especially when it comes to issues of moral rectitude.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US