On March 31, Stanford University's Hoover Institution began to make its collection of the diaries of the late president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) available for historical research. The diaries provided first will be those that cover the years 1917 to 1931. These diaries of Chiang, as well as later ones of his son, the former president Chiang Ching-kuo(蔣經國), also on loan to the institution, will unquestionably provide a rich treasure trove to explore. However, they will also pose a tremendous challenge to historians and researchers of Chinese history.
There is no question that the diaries will provide an abundant source of much wanted information; anyone interested in the history of modern China and Taiwan will look forward to the insights and perspective they will provide into the happenings and personalities of those tumultuous times.
Yet after the immediate exaltation of knowing that they are available, there follows the realization of the difficulties to be encountered in accurately interpreting them. In a variety of ways, diaries always have a secret side of what they do and what they do not reveal.
The fact that Chiang Kai-shek let it be known as early as 1950 that he wanted them preserved indicates they will present how he wanted to be remembered. We are also told that the diaries will be further edited by family members. Certain names and details will only be available in 2035. While this could be expected for privacy reasons, it does raise the question of how much privacy needs to be protected, especially in matters that happened more than 50 years ago where most, if not all, of the participants are now deceased.
Nevertheless, the diaries will be a great benefit. Historians will certainly not be the only ones who will want to read them. Even psychologists can anticipate controversy in contrasting what Chiang Kai-shek wrote with what he did in the reality of history.
For starters, Chiang Kai-shek early on in the 1930s recorded how he detested the Japanese and would not want to give an inch of Chinese soil to them. Was this done in response to many of his critics in 1931 who doubted that he had the will to oppose Japanese aggression? Likewise, how does this square with how he was first concerned with eliminating his main rivals -- the Chinese Communist Party. It would take the Xian Incident in December 1936 to force him to turn his attention to the Japanese, who had already made huge inroads into China.
Continuing further, his wartime record against the Japanese for many years was one of retreat. In 1943, the Allied Forces made him part of the Cairo Convention and gave him both arms and assurances of future territory particularly because they were afraid that he would make a separate peace with Japan, and force them to continue World War II on their own.
Similarly, in another sample entry in 1948, Chiang Kai-shek records that he felt the main problem with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in China was corruption and rot from within. Was this an honest self-assessment of the party at that time and, if so, why was he helpless to prevent it? It certainly would prove to be a main reason why they would lose China.
For those who would follow his retreat to Taiwan and the subsequent corruption, White Terror and martial law inflicted on that island until well after Chiang Kai-shek's death in 1975, other natural questions come. Why did he still not do anything about it? Why did he maintain his extended presidency that was against the Constitution of the Republic of China? How could a man that professed to be for democracy, never allow the people of Taiwan to vote for their president in the 30 years of his control?
That the diaries were meticulously preserved over all these years raises additional questions. What about diaries of others, especially Chiang Kai-shek's opponents, that were destroyed under his watch. One prime example is that of the diaries of Lei Chen (雷震), who died in 1979.
Lei was once a strong supporter of Chiang Kai-shek, but he fell afoul of him when he pressed for democracy in Taiwan and began publishing the Free China Journal. Lei would subsequently be arrested in 1960, put on trial, convicted and sent to prison.
In prison Lei would write volumes on the hope and goals of democracy in Taiwan and his treatment by Chiang Kai-shek. All of these materials were confiscated and destroyed.
Diaries often hide more than they reveal; they certainly can hide more than actual taped conversations of the times. For those who lived through the Watergate period in the US, the experience of the Nixon tapes immediately comes to mind.
In the hope of providing the "true picture" for historians and to illustrate what great contributions he would make as president of the US, former president Richard Nixon secretly taped all that was said in the Oval Office. He hoped to leave a legacy. But what he hoped would be his glory in many ways turned out to be his downfall.
When the Watergate break-in occurred, the tapes became part of evidence revealing how far the "cover-up" reached. The only thing that saved Nixon from complete blame was the 18-and-a-half minute gap in his conversation with H.R. Haldeman that was "accidentally" erased by his loyal secretary Rosemary Woods. The words were lost to history and only a smoking gun remained.
Such are the many questions that arise with the Chiang Kai-shek diaries. Regardless, they will be a definite and needed contribution to history. We can only hope historians will be found who measure up to the difficult task of interpreting them for what they really say and what they hide.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95