Recently, the University of Hong Kong's Public Opinion Program released the latest findings on Hong Kong residents' opinions on issues involving Taiwan. The results obtained earlier this month revealed that 83 percent of respondents interviewed opposed Taiwanese independence and 60 percent opposed Taiwan rejoining the UN. Sixty percent were confident in ultimate reunification across the Taiwan Strait. As for the applicability of the "one country, two systems" policy to Taiwan, 53 percent gave a positive view while 33 percent gave a negative view.
There has been an upward trend in these statistics. What does this indicate in the current condition of the Hong Kong people? And why should we take note of what Hong Kongers think about these issues.
Robert Ting-yiu Chung (鐘庭耀), director of the program, observed that"Hong Kong people's strong feelings against the independence of Taiwan are both a function of their increasing agreement with the central government viewpoint after the handover, as well as an indicator of their displeasure over President Chen Shiu-bian's (陳水扁) recent speeches and actions, especially his recent move to cease the function of the National Unification Council and the application of its guidelines."
Some local reporters seem to agree with Chung, citing his analysis uncritically. However, if we take a look at other surveys conducted by the program, then we should get a clearer picture of why Hong Kong residents hold mixed views on Taiwan.
First, Hong Kong people are only reflecting their personal preference when they were asked about the applicability of "one country, two systems" to Taiwan. Besides, although Hong Kongers were skeptical about the city's reversion to China in 1997, their confidence in the "one country, two systems" formula has grown steadily over the years.
This has something to do with Beijing's efforts to exercise self-restraint with regard to Hong Kong affairs. Beijing has also become increasing tactful in the way it rules Hong Kong and has come up with a strategy in dealing with democracy there. This is why Hong Kongers are unable to grasp the political reality facing Taiwan and what Taiwan needs on the diplomatic front. This lack of understanding has led them to believe that the "one country, two systems" formula is also applicable to Taiwan.
Second, many Hong Kong people believe in cross-strait reunification not because they are concerned about Taiwan's public opinion or political changes but because they are satisfied with the current situation in Hong Kong. As Hong Kong's political and economic situation improves, its resident's confidence in cross-strait unification has grown deeper.
Conversely, if Hong Kong were chaotic in every respect and public discontent were to rise, opinions there would not be so positive. The mass rally that took place in July 2003 in Hong Kong and Beijing's nomination of Donald Tsang (
Third, Hong Kongers satisfaction with the Hong Kong government's level of democratization has not diminished as a result of Tsang's political reforms being rejected. Rather, their satisfaction level has risen over the years. Moreover, growing numbers of Hong Kong residents are viewing themselves as Chinese rather than Hong Kongers.
In fact, now that Hong Kong's democratic movement has come to a standstill and Hong Kongers are learning to become "docile" Chinese, they cannot understand why more and more Taiwanese refuse to be Chinese. This is a discrepancy caused by history, memory and different political systems.
There is a huge disparity between public opinion in Hong Kong and Taiwan. In Hong Kong, social values and public opinion have long since tilted in China's favor. Also Hong Kong's identity problem is not as serious as Taiwan's. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that people living in Hong Kong are opposed to the cause of Taiwanese independence.
I have never questioned how Hong Kongers view the future of Taiwan, for I believe that they are concerned about the island. By the same token, Taiwan also has the obligation to study and show concern for democratic development in Hong Kong. When former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) proposed to apply the principle of "one country, two systems" to Hong Kong, it was actually intended to set an example for Taiwan. We might despise and reject China's authoritarian political system, but we should never make the mistake of ignoring it.
Do Hong Kong people understand the Taiwanese? Can Hong Hong, an economically developed but politically naive society, understand the pride of a nation having self determination? Under the "one country, two systems" formula, the relationship between the central and local governments would be a step backwards for a democratic society like Taiwan.
Nobody in Taiwan is willing to experience how Beijing keeps a tight rein on freedom of speech and cultural development.
Since Hong Kong's media outlets are already concerned about Beijing's intervention in this special administrative region, how can Taiwanese accept what Beijing is asking them to do? However, we also have to ask those Taiwanese who hold short-sighted views if they understand anything about Hong Kong or present-day China.
Jackson Yeh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers