Recently, the University of Hong Kong's Public Opinion Program released the latest findings on Hong Kong residents' opinions on issues involving Taiwan. The results obtained earlier this month revealed that 83 percent of respondents interviewed opposed Taiwanese independence and 60 percent opposed Taiwan rejoining the UN. Sixty percent were confident in ultimate reunification across the Taiwan Strait. As for the applicability of the "one country, two systems" policy to Taiwan, 53 percent gave a positive view while 33 percent gave a negative view.
There has been an upward trend in these statistics. What does this indicate in the current condition of the Hong Kong people? And why should we take note of what Hong Kongers think about these issues.
Robert Ting-yiu Chung (鐘庭耀), director of the program, observed that"Hong Kong people's strong feelings against the independence of Taiwan are both a function of their increasing agreement with the central government viewpoint after the handover, as well as an indicator of their displeasure over President Chen Shiu-bian's (陳水扁) recent speeches and actions, especially his recent move to cease the function of the National Unification Council and the application of its guidelines."
Some local reporters seem to agree with Chung, citing his analysis uncritically. However, if we take a look at other surveys conducted by the program, then we should get a clearer picture of why Hong Kong residents hold mixed views on Taiwan.
First, Hong Kong people are only reflecting their personal preference when they were asked about the applicability of "one country, two systems" to Taiwan. Besides, although Hong Kongers were skeptical about the city's reversion to China in 1997, their confidence in the "one country, two systems" formula has grown steadily over the years.
This has something to do with Beijing's efforts to exercise self-restraint with regard to Hong Kong affairs. Beijing has also become increasing tactful in the way it rules Hong Kong and has come up with a strategy in dealing with democracy there. This is why Hong Kongers are unable to grasp the political reality facing Taiwan and what Taiwan needs on the diplomatic front. This lack of understanding has led them to believe that the "one country, two systems" formula is also applicable to Taiwan.
Second, many Hong Kong people believe in cross-strait reunification not because they are concerned about Taiwan's public opinion or political changes but because they are satisfied with the current situation in Hong Kong. As Hong Kong's political and economic situation improves, its resident's confidence in cross-strait unification has grown deeper.
Conversely, if Hong Kong were chaotic in every respect and public discontent were to rise, opinions there would not be so positive. The mass rally that took place in July 2003 in Hong Kong and Beijing's nomination of Donald Tsang (
Third, Hong Kongers satisfaction with the Hong Kong government's level of democratization has not diminished as a result of Tsang's political reforms being rejected. Rather, their satisfaction level has risen over the years. Moreover, growing numbers of Hong Kong residents are viewing themselves as Chinese rather than Hong Kongers.
In fact, now that Hong Kong's democratic movement has come to a standstill and Hong Kongers are learning to become "docile" Chinese, they cannot understand why more and more Taiwanese refuse to be Chinese. This is a discrepancy caused by history, memory and different political systems.
There is a huge disparity between public opinion in Hong Kong and Taiwan. In Hong Kong, social values and public opinion have long since tilted in China's favor. Also Hong Kong's identity problem is not as serious as Taiwan's. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that people living in Hong Kong are opposed to the cause of Taiwanese independence.
I have never questioned how Hong Kongers view the future of Taiwan, for I believe that they are concerned about the island. By the same token, Taiwan also has the obligation to study and show concern for democratic development in Hong Kong. When former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) proposed to apply the principle of "one country, two systems" to Hong Kong, it was actually intended to set an example for Taiwan. We might despise and reject China's authoritarian political system, but we should never make the mistake of ignoring it.
Do Hong Kong people understand the Taiwanese? Can Hong Hong, an economically developed but politically naive society, understand the pride of a nation having self determination? Under the "one country, two systems" formula, the relationship between the central and local governments would be a step backwards for a democratic society like Taiwan.
Nobody in Taiwan is willing to experience how Beijing keeps a tight rein on freedom of speech and cultural development.
Since Hong Kong's media outlets are already concerned about Beijing's intervention in this special administrative region, how can Taiwanese accept what Beijing is asking them to do? However, we also have to ask those Taiwanese who hold short-sighted views if they understand anything about Hong Kong or present-day China.
Jackson Yeh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
The Legislative Yuan on Friday held another cross-party caucus negotiation on a special act for bolstering national defense that the Executive Yuan had proposed last year. The party caucuses failed to reach a consensus on several key provisions, so the next session is scheduled for today, where many believe substantial progress would finally be made. The plan for an eight-year NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.59 billion) special defense budget was first proposed by the Cabinet in November last year, but the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers have continuously blocked it from being listed on the agenda for
On Tuesday last week, the Presidential Office announced, less than 24 hours before he was scheduled to depart, that President William Lai’s (賴清德) planned official trip to Eswatini, Taiwan’s sole diplomatic ally in Africa, had been delayed. It said that the three island nations of Seychelles, Mauritius and Madagascar had, without prior notice, revoked the charter plane’s overflight permits following “intense pressure” from China. Lai, in his capacity as the Republic of China’s (ROC) president, was to attend the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s accession. King Mswati visited Taiwan to attend Lai’s inauguration in 2024. This is the first
RSS