Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) is due to visit the US next month, but there is some confusion as to the actual details of his itinerary. Some reports have him arriving in Seattle on April 22 and meeting US President George W. Bush in Washington two days later; others have him arriving on April 20 and meeting Bush on April 22. This in itself is not unusual. A degree of secrecy is required to ensure Hu doesn't run into any Falun Gong protests. There is, however, another report which I have every reason to believe is true: that Hu will be received by Microsoft chairman Bill Gates at his luxurious Lake Washington residence during the Seattle leg of his trip.
A meeting between Hu and Gates is, one would think, quite important, and certainly not before time. They are both powerful men who share mutual interests.
At first glance it might seem that Hu, national leader of China, has little in common with Gates, chairman of Microsoft Corp. This, however, is not the case, for Hu's daughter got married in 2003 to Daniel Mao (茅道臨), Internet tycoon and former chief executive officer of Sina Corp. If Gates is one of the fathers of the Internet in the US, then Hu is the father-in-law of the Internet in China; and just as Gates is the wealthiest man in the US (and the world), Mao is ranked 11th in China.
More important, however, is Hu's special interest in the Internet. Ever since he came to power, he has sought to strengthen state control of the Web, arresting anyone with views that conflict with his own, and throwing the book at them. The US State Department's 2005 Country Reports of Human Rights Practices is critical of the Chinese government, saying that it seeks to censor print, broadcast and electronic media, as well as Internet content.
The worrying thing is that the four major Internet companies in the US -- namely Yahoo, Microsoft, Google and Cisco -- are all aiders and abetters in China's efforts, erecting between them the world's most effective Internet supervision architecture.
Despite admonitions expressed during a US congressional hearing recently, I foresee these Internet giants continuing to collude with the Chinese dictators for financial reasons. Together, they will ensnare the Chinese populace in their Web of censorship, and cast their "net" over freedom and democracy in China. There will be no discussion of how to improve human rights in China when Gates meets Hu. The only talk will be about how the two men can further their own interests.
Gates is known, not only in the US but the world over, for his donations to good causes. Why, then, is he not promoting improvements in human rights in China, the world's largest dictatorship? This would serve to prove that his donations are more than a mere public relations exercise. He should be trying to encourage Internet freedom in China, rather than undermining his reputation through his actions.
Google made its move on China last year, bagging several Microsoft employees, including Lee Kai-fu (李開復), former head of Microsoft Research China. This provoked Microsoft into taking Google to court. During the hearings, Lee revealed how Gates had sounded off about the Chinese government in particularly colorful language. Gates seems to spend most of his time in court for one reason or the other, but this was the first time his anti-Chinese streak came to light.
If these companies continue to pander to the Chinese government like this, they will not only be shooting themselves in the foot, they will also allow the US to get caught up in China's net, a situation that could eventually threaten that country's national security.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US