What is this new penchant of political leaders to make promises so florid that they carry with them a self-destruct mechanism if things go astray?
Premier Su Tseng-chang (
If Su is sincere about reducing crime, he has done himself no favors by committing himself to a result that relies on complex statistical analyses -- the trashing of which has become a pan-blue-camp specialty, regardless of the strength of the evidence -- as well as the public's perception via opinion polls that crime is falling. Worse, this perception is more a product of media manipulation and hyperbole than it is of personal experience of crime and social trends.
Tying the leadership of a Cabinet and the morale of its ministers to this standard is unnecessary -- and obstructive. Instead of putting pressure on Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Su's backers in the party must be hoping against hope that Minister of the Interior Lee Yi-yang (
Last year's local government elections were in part a test of the new party chairmen. Ma cleverly promised to step down if the pan-blue camp did not secure a certain number of city and county electorates. Ma was clever because the number he chose was modest under the circumstances. Su almost immediately followed with the same promise, brandishing a number so unrealistic that he was more or less forced to start considering his next career move there and then.
But at the time, it seemed that Su could step down as chairman of the DPP with honor. He simply did not have the time to fix the mess that he inherited, but his resignation gave the party a brief shot of dignity that someone could accept responsibility and take a fall.
Now Su has repeated this tactic. But this time he doesn't represent a party; he heads the Executive Yuan. It is a radical move at a time that the Cabinet requires strength, solidarity and confidence after years of instability and lack of momentum. For the sake of the government, Su would be better advised to never give up, never give in, never resign until all other options have been exhausted. Now that Su has floated the prospect of resignation after the shortest time possible in the job, DPP supporters who have seen their premiers come and go must be starting to get that sinking feeling again.
Meanwhile, the Mainlander-dominated criminal network Bamboo Union and other pro-KMT thugs must be rubbing their hands with barely suppressed glee. If Su is Ma's only credible challenger for the presidency, then here's an open invitation for them from Su himself to contribute to his possible removal from office by markedly increasing their criminal activity. Pro-DPP criminals, for their part, are hardly likely to wind back their operations and place limits on their livelihoods to indulge a politician's risky strategy.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS