Two years ago the Chinese non-governmental organization (NGO) Green Watershed successfully led a fight to halt construction of hydropower stations along the pristine banks of the Nujiang river.
But its victory was pyrrhic.
While the temporary stay it secured on the power project is still in place, Green Watershed lost it its operating license and its founder Yu Xiaogang (
As the group found, opposing local officials is fraught with risk.
While China has vowed to step up protection of its heavily degraded environment, local politics all too often trump national policy and effective independent policing, environmentalists say.
The group's troubles began two years ago when it called on the central government to review the planned construction of 13 hydropower stations along the Nujiang, one of only two of China's major rivers that still run dam-free.
DAMNING PROJECT
If all dams were to be completed along the river, which is on the UN's list of Protected Areas, they would extend 700km and produce more than 100 billion kilowatts per hour of electricity to feed China's voracious appetite for power.
The Thanlwin, as the river is called in Burmese, originates on the snowy peaks of Tibet, its azure, angry waters wending 2,400km through steep terraced canyons in southwestern China and then Myanmar before emptying into the Andaman Sea.
China's more than 22,000 dams already comprise 46 percent of the world's total, according to the UN Environmental Program (UNEP).
Although the UNEP has given its eco-friendly stamp of approval to many of China's dams projects in the past, environmentalists at Green Watershed argue that damming the Nujiang would damage the local environment, threatening the area's fragile eco-balance as the reservoirs flood fertile land.
New dams could also wipe out fish species whose migration routes to traditional breeding grounds would be blocked, but perhaps more importantly would threaten millions of livelihoods, the group said.
Determined to make the Beijing listen, Yu, who founded Green Watershed in 2002, began to drum up support in the community by letting residents know about plans spearheaded by state-run China Huadian Corp, one of the country's largest power groups.
Yu took residents to Lancan river, known in Southeast Asia as the Mekong, to let them see the impoverishing effects on the populace living around the Manwan dam, a hydro station active since 1993. They also went to Beijing for discussions with the government.
RISING CONCERNS
At the time of the conflict, a confluence of concerns about China's over-investment in industry and the effects of environmental damage wrought by 25 years of heated economic development played into the hands of Green Watershed's campaign.
Increasingly concerned that the nation's economic growth model was environmentally unsustainable -- an issue that was high on the agenda during the National People's Congress -- Beijing began to heed warnings from the State Environmental Protection Agency and NGOs like Yu's.
Premier Wen Jiabao (
Yunnan officials were not amused.
"One deputy governor of Yunnan Province said in a very public occasion that Green Watershed ... had damaged Yunnan's hydropower development plan, and therefore damaged the economic development of the entire province," Yu said.
Their wrath turned on Yu and his employees. Attempts to curtail the organization's influence led to spying, harassment and the revoking of the group's license, he said.
"We've been operating as an unqualified organization for some time, as of a couple of years ago, the government said we were unqualified," Yu said.
HARASSMENT
Officials didn't stop there, however.
"I've been banned from traveling abroad -- they limit my freedom. It's been like this for over one year," Yu said. "Each time I tried police stopped me at the airport. When I asked them why, they just told me there was no reason."
"I can't go to the places that would become reservoirs and I can't get in touch with people living in that region -- the government forbids us to do that," he said.
"They said that we are causing trouble for them by going to those places," he said.
An official from Yunnan Provincial Bureau of Civil Affairs in charge of NGOs refused to comment.
Over the last few years, authorities have looked upon NGOs as somewhat benign organizations that can help the government solve common ills such as prostitution, addiction and domestic violence.
FINE LINE
But Yu's case is a stark reminder of the fine line between aid and interference in business the government deems as exclusively theirs.
"We know what kind of things we can do and what kind of things we can't do," said Wang Yongchen (
"We are now calling for all the procedures to be carried out according to law, but if they [government body] do not want to do it then we can't do anything about it," said Wang, who played major role in getting Wen to suspend the Nujiang project.
Xue Ye (薛野), director of Beijing-based Friend of Nature, which also opposes the Nujiang project, said that Green Watershed's case was typical.
"Actually it is how the local governments usually reacts," Xue said.
"If they say something bad about the government, then the government will punish them," Xue said.
"It's not that Chinese NGOs don't want to adopt a Greenpeace-like approach, it's that China doesn't have the conditions yet," Xue said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US