President George W. Bush's abilities as an opening batsman may be tested when he visits Pakistan this week. US National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said that when Bush attends a "cricket event" on Saturday in Islamabad, it is uncertain whether he plans to watch or play. "Who knows what he'll do?"
As Bush steps up to the crease, the official spin on his one-day visit, which follows a trip to India and precedes a stopover in Afghanistan, is that Washington has Pakistan's interests at heart.
The bilateral agenda includes counter-terrorism, the Kashmir dispute with India, and elections promised next year by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who seized power in a 1999 coup.
But Bush, pointing to US help after last October's earthquake, is keen to show the common touch.
"This is a relationship that's much bigger than the `war on terror,'" he told Pakistani television at the weekend. Pakistanis should know "that the American people care about them."
This feeling is not reciprocated in some quarters. Much of the country is in uproar, ostensibly over the Danish cartoons scandal.
Islamist parties, principally the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), have used the row and visit to stoke opposition to Musharraf and his US alliance, linking it to "anti-Muslim" US actions along the Afghan border and in Iraq and exploiting economic discontent.
Musharraf's hold on power is weaker than at any time since 1999, said Ayaz Amir, a Dawn newspaper columnist. "Since beleaguered governments are prone to clutch at straws, we can expect Islamabad to gloat over the Bush visit. Given the tide of anti-Americanism on which the country is afloat, it is more likely to be a huge embarrassment if not an outright kiss of death."
Graham Usher, writing from Islamabad for The Nation, said the JI linked the Pakistani military's Inter-Services Intelligence Agency to jihadi groups in Afghanistan and Kashmir -- until Musharraf got in the way. He suggested the army could move against him if events spun out of control, as it had against previous leaders.
"The Islamists in Pakistan have never been so powerful," he said.
A government official said that was an exaggeration.
"The Islamist parties have street power but as far as voting power is concerned, Pakistan is a very moderate society," he said.
Musharraf had strengthened grassroots democracy, he said, and the economy was expanding. Next year's elections, including a presidential contest, would go ahead.
But Human Rights Watch said Bush should press Musharraf to stand down, claiming he had weakened mainstream political parties and democratic processes.
"Statements from pro-government politicians appear to be setting the stage for Musharraf's continued rule past 2007," the group said. "The US should not allow Musharraf to exploit his alliance in the `war on terror' to entrench himself further in power."
Bush, a keen Musharraf admirer, is likely to ignore such advice. Although the US says it wants faster progress on restoring democracy, Pakistan's primary importance to Washington remains its key role in helping fight al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
In India, similarly hard-headed calculations will be in play. Bush will seek a strengthened strategic and economic partnership, partly through nuclear cooperation, to help offset the rise of China.
He says he will push for a Kashmir solution. But more pressing in American eyes is the need to stiffen Indian support for apparently contradictory curbs on Iran's nuclear activities. The US is also urging cancelation of a joint gas pipeline project with Tehran.
As in Pakistan, such US aims are highly controversial. To achieve them, Bush will need to show deft footwork amid much hostile bowling.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS