Once upon a time, cigarette smokers could enjoy themselves throughout Southeast Asia, toking up in bars, restaurants and hotel lobbies without fear of fines or scoldings.
Those carefree days for tobacco puffers in this traditionally smoker-friendly region are arguably going up in smoke.
Malaysia and Thailand, where smoking bans already exist in all air-conditioned restaurants, government offices, airports and other public venues like shopping malls, are now seriously considering making bars and other entertainment venues no-smoking zones.
"Actually, the government wanted to sign the law last December," said Prakit Vathesatogkit, head of Thailand's Anti-Smoking Foundation. "It's just that the officials had not prepared the documents to include bars and nightclubs in the bill banning smoking in hotel lobbies, but the minister was ready to sign them."
Thailand, which along with Singapore is at the forefront of the region's anti-smoking campaign, has enacted a host of restrictions on the tobacco industry including bans on cigarette advertisements, bans on smoking in most public places and requirements that all cigarette packs include graphic photos depicting the ill effects of tobacco on health.
Last year the government banned cigarette displays at points of sale, making Thailand the third country to do so.
The result? Thailand's puffer population has stagnated at about 10 million over the past decade, falling as a percentage of the population.
"We estimate that's 4 million less smokers than it would have been without two decades of anti-smoking campaigns," Prakit said.
In Singapore, smoking in buses and cinemas was banned way back in 1970, and is now prohibited in schools, courts, buses, taxis and all air-conditioned public places as well as pools, open air stadiums, bus shelters and toilets.
"Any person caught smoking in these places is liable to be prosecuted in court for a fine of up to S$1,000 [US$618]," said a spokeswoman for Singapore's Health Promotion Board.
Singaporean smokers made up only 12.6 percent of the population in 2004, one of the lowest rates in the world.
In Malaysia, the Health Ministry recently announced that discotheques, bars and outdoor recreation parks would soon be gazetted as non-smoking areas.
The ministry also plans to hike tobacco taxes by another 13 percent this year. In 2004 the government launched a US$27 million, five-year anti-smoking drive dubbed "Tak Nak" (Don't Want It), but it is coming up against tough resistance from Malaysian puffers, who account for 5 million of the country's 23 million people.
"The efforts against smoking is not achieving much," admitted Mohamed Idris of the Consumers Association in Penang.
"The smoking habit is being successfully promoted and new smokers are still being recruited every day," he said.
Despite Malaysia's ban on tobacco advertising on TV and radio, cigarette companies are allowed to sponsor sporting events, pop concerts, parties and "adventure activities," earning Malaysia some notoriety as the world's capital for indirect advertising.
Indonesia, where 62 percent of adult men are smokers -- ranking the archipelago of 220 million people fifth among the world's leading tobacco consumers -- the government's anti-smoking efforts have run into serious opposition.
A ban on smoking in all public places in Jakarta was announced last year but only went into force this month, giving puffers a year-long grace period to adjust to the city ordinance that sets a US$5,000 fine and a six-month jail penalty for violations.
After attempting to enforce the law last week, Jakarta Governor Sutiyoso decided to extend the learning period by another two months.
Despite Jakarta's efforts, Indonesia essentially remains a smoker's and cigarette producer's paradise.
In 2004, over 210 billion cigarettes were sold in Indonesia, where 90 percent of all smokers opt for kreteks, the country's distinctive cigarette that mixes tobacco with a variety of other ingredients including cloves.
But even "white" cigarettes find Indonesia profitable.
"BAT [British American Tobacco] sells about 5.3 billion sticks in Indonesia, about 2.4 percent of the total market," said Benny Sugiharto, manager of BAT's factory in Cirebon.
The government greatly benefits from the sales. Officials say the tobacco industry accounts for some 95 percent of the government's excise revenue of over US$3.2 billion. Indonesia's powerful tobacco and kretek producers, some of the most profitable firms in the country, are known to have tremendous political clout.
In the Philippines, tobacco lobbyists are also a problem.
"There are several lobbying efforts from tobacco companies and business establishments, who prefer not to have anti-smoking ordinances because these affect their business," said a Manila-based World Health Organization (WHO) official who preferred to remain anonymous.
Unlike Indonesia and the Philippines, where the private sector and multinationals such as BAT and Philip Morris control the industry, Thailand's tobacco sector was dominated by the government's Thailand Tobacco Monopoly (TTM) up until 1991, when the US forced the country to open its doors to the Marlboro Man and other foreign brands.
The government monopoly has been one of the key components in Thailand's relative success story in pushing through anti-smoking legislation and curbing cigarette consumption.
"I think in the Thai situation the Thai politicians were less influenced by the tobacco industry because the TTM is a government monopoly," Prakit said.
"Because of the high level of consciousness about health issues among Thais and because we were able to follow lots of WHO advice, politicians in Thailand have to think twice before they associate themselves with the tobacco industry because they would get negative publicity," Prakit said.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS