Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has built his reputation on talking tough on terrorism, came under international pressure on Friday for his invitation to leaders of the radical Palestinian movement Hamas for talks in Moscow.
The US called for Russia to clarify its intentions and an Israeli minister described the move by Putin, who has made the bloody anti-separatist war in Chechnya a hallmark of his presidency, as a "knife in the back."
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov responded by predicting that the international community would eventually support the olive branch held out to Hamas.
"I'm not afraid to predict that some time in the future many leading states, and I'm thinking in particular about the quartet, will start supporting Hamas contacts ... to make clear to the Hamas authorities the attitudes of one or another state toward Middle East settlement," he said during an official visit to Italy.
However, an earlier statement by the quartet -- the US, UN, EU and Russia -- made clear that relations with Hamas were possible only if the organization af-firmed Israel's right to exist and renounced violence.
The diplomatic row began on Thursday when Putin said he would invite Hamas officials to Moscow "soon" for discussions on the future of the Middle East peace process.
Hamas welcomed the proposal and said it would attend talks.
There was support on Friday from France's foreign ministry, which said that the proposal "may contribute to advancing our positions" on the Middle East peace process.
Russia's special envoy to the Middle East, Alexander Kalugin, also sought to underline that Russia was not giving Hamas a free ride.
"We will call on Hamas to change its position in the meeting with its representatives. We will uphold the positions of the international `quartet.' This will be a signal to Hamas that we expect action in response," he told Interfax news agency.
"We call on them to adhere to prior agreements, to put an end to terrorist acts. And, of course, they must move to recognize Israel's right to exist," Kalugin said.
Russian commentators were divided on Friday over whether Putin's offer to Hamas was positive.
Russia's Kommersant daily said Moscow wants to persuade Hamas to "leave all of Palestine's international contacts under the control of [Palestinian President] Mahmoud Abbas" and to enforce monitoring over how Western funds given to the Palestinian authority are spent.
The Izvestia daily put the Hamas invitation in the context of Moscow's policy on Iran's nuclear programme, saying Putin "has now assumed the role of the main dove of peace" in the Middle East.
Russia is seeking to position itself as a key broker in the international crisis over Iran's nuclear ambitions.
An important proposal for ending the standoff includes an offer from Moscow to enrich Iran's uranium on Russian territory. That, Moscow says, would allow Iran to run a civilian programme and the international community to keep tabs on potential bomb-making material.
Izvestia said, however, that Putin's role has been undermined by only partial diplomatic success over Iran.
But Viktor Kremenyuk, an independent analyst from the USA-Canada Institute in Moscow, said Russia's Iranian diplomacy could actually help links with Hamas because of ties between the Islamic republic and the Palestinian group.
"Moscow has very good relations with Tehran and Tehran could push Hamas to ensure that the Moscow visit gives results," he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past