The massive victory of Hamas in the Palestinian parliamentary elections stunned much of the world, but the outcome should not have been so surprising. Indeed, Hamas' moment of triumph is part of a growing regional pattern.
Four years ago, Turkey's Islamic-oriented Justice and Development Party won a plurality in parliamentary elections and formed a government. A month later, a similarly named Islamic party in Morocco, Parti de la Justice et du Development, finished third in legislative elections.
Last December, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt (legally banned since 1954) scored equally impressive results, garnering 20 percent of the popular vote and 88 seats in the parliament, making it the main opposition bloc to Mubarak's ruling National Democratic Party. Hezbollah in Lebanon and Shiite parties in Iraq have also performed well in elections.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Despite this democratic endorsement, most Western governments have been reluctant to engage with these parties or to prepare for Islamists coming to power through the ballot box.
The irony is obvious: Islamists, who seem suspicious of democracy as a Western plot, took US President George W. Bush's promotion of democracy in the Muslim world more seriously than America's autocratic friends -- and possibly more seriously than Bush himself.
In his first press conference after Hamas's victory, Bush was visibly at a loss for words in responding to this "unexpected development."
The truth is that over the last three years, some regional insiders, including me, had several lengthy discussions with Bush's advisors on the National Security Council and in the State Department.
We urged the Bush administration to formulate a consistent policy that engages the region's Islamists who are willing to rule by democratic principles. Some of this debate was widely publicized.
Part of the US' reluctance to deal with Islamists reflected concern over the reaction of autocratic regimes, some of which are long-time allies.
This fear proved not only unwarranted, but also counterproductive, for it has not stopped the march of the Islamists in the Arab Middle East.
Now it is time for a fresh and bold approach toward all contending political forces in the Muslim world.
First, the US and the West must stop supporting autocrats with aid, trade and arms.
Second, there must be a push to expand the public space for the Muslim world's democrats, so free media and independent judiciaries to protect press freedom need to be boosted.
Third, an active dialogue that engages the Islamists, no matter how difficult, must begin and continue.
The West needs to establish clear and consistent rules of engagement. It is legitimate and imperative to make resumption of aid to Palestinians contingent on Hamas' recognition of Israel's right to exist and on its commitment to all international agreements previously signed by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority.
In an earlier step toward recognition by the world community, the PLO had to revamp the Palestinian Covenant, which called for the destruction of Israel. There is no reason why Hamas would not follow that precedent, if the demand to do so were made relentlessly.
In fact, all militant liberation movements have renounced violence in due time, from the Irish Republican Army to the Sandinistas to the African National Congress.
Likewise, Israel must reciprocate every gesture of good will from Hamas, however psychologically difficult this may be. After all, in 1947 similar Jewish "freedom fighters" blew up the King David Hotel, killing tens of British officers.
Until the 1970s, these Zionist guerillas were wanted as terrorists by British authorities. Then one of them, Menachem Begin, was elected prime minister of Israel and became a partner in peace with Egypt's president Anwar Sadat.
Sadat himself was a suspected terrorist, according to Egyptian authorities, for having plotted and taken part in assassinating a prominent political figure. But both Sadat and Begin became respected worldwide for taking risks for peace and won a joint Nobel Peace prize.
So, for Hamas as well as for the US, the West and Israel, it is futile to look back in anger and frustration. Instead, they all should look forward to creating anew the more positive legacies of Sadat, Begin, Rabin and even Ariel Sharon.
If those leaders could disavow their own violent pasts and take practical steps toward peace in the region, why can't Hamas?
Saad Eddin Ibrahim is a leading Egyptian democracy and human-rights activist, chairman of the Ibn Khaldun Center and professor of sociology at the American University in Cairo.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers