Russia faces important strategic setbacks if the Iran nuclear issue is referred to the UN Security Council and will fight behind the scenes to prevent this, despite public comments suggesting Moscow was moving closer to the West on the issue, experts say.
In addition to its high commercial stakes in Iran, Russia is also striving to retain its footing in the volatile Caucasus and Central Asian regions which could be upset dramatically and quickly if relations with Tehran soured, as they would if Moscow joined the West in a UN referral for Iran.
"The main goal of Russian diplomacy at present is to prevent the Iran issue from going to the UN Security Council," said Vladimir Yevseyev, coordinator of the nuclear non-proliferation program at the Carnegie Moscow Center political research institute.
"Russia does not want to lose Iran. Russia will do whatever possible to stop this decision," he said.
Confident assertions by European and US diplomats that Russia has dropped its long-standing resistance to referring Iran to the Security Council are ill-informed and reflect a misreading of the Russian political mix predicating Moscow's policy on the issue, experts say.
Moscow's continued reticence about referring Iran to the UN Security Council was underscored on Tuesday by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who said that sanctions were "not the best and by no means the only way" to resolve the Iran nuclear standoff.
In addition to payments reportedly in excess of US$1 billion that Russian state and private firms will receive under contracts to help Iran build and launch its first civilian nuclear power station, Moscow is determined to nurture its long-term business and economic interests in Iran.
Chances for doing so would disintegrate quickly and permanently if Russia were to walk away from Iran now, the experts explain.
"In attempting to curb Iran's nuclear program, Western countries are also deciding another issue: the removal of Russia from Iran's lucrative energy market," said Radzhab Safarov, director of the Moscow-based Center for Iranian Research and an adviser to the Russian State Duma.
"Construction of the Bushehr nuclear plant is not only economically profitable for Moscow -- it also strengthens its long-term influence in Iran, a key country in the Islamic world and a strategic partner for Russia," Safarov said in an interview with the daily Vremya.
"It is not hard to imagine how Tehran will react, and what will happen to Russia's image, if, in this difficult period for Iran, it sides with the West and votes for sanctions," he said.
Referral of the Iran nuclear issue to the UN Security Council represents a no-win situation for Russia as this could lead to a vote on sanctions against Tehran, forcing Moscow into a stark choice between staying friendly with the West or protecting its many other interests linked to Iran.
For Moscow, that choice is by no means the "no brainer" that some Western officials seem to think it should be, as the Kremlin sees, in its relationship with Tehran, direct links to stability on Russia's southern flanks in the Caucasus and Central Asia.
For instance: Iran, around one-third of whose population is of ethnic Azeri origin, has de facto influence on stability in the ex-Soviet republic of Azerbaijan, which in turn plays an important stabilizing role in the wider Caucasus region, including inside southern Russia itself.
"Iran could easily destabilize the situation in Azerbaijan," Yevseyev said.
He added that good ties between Moscow and Tehran helped keep in check moves by the US to boost its own presence there.
Another example: Iran has particularly close ties with the former Soviet republic of Tajikistan, where much of the population in the south and west of the country derives from ethnic groups also indigenous to Iran.
"Both Russia and Iran have interests in Central Asia and Russia does not want to see Iran's position grow stronger there," Yevseyev said.
He noted that Russia was also facing increasing competition from China for influence in the region.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95