Russia faces important strategic setbacks if the Iran nuclear issue is referred to the UN Security Council and will fight behind the scenes to prevent this, despite public comments suggesting Moscow was moving closer to the West on the issue, experts say.
In addition to its high commercial stakes in Iran, Russia is also striving to retain its footing in the volatile Caucasus and Central Asian regions which could be upset dramatically and quickly if relations with Tehran soured, as they would if Moscow joined the West in a UN referral for Iran.
"The main goal of Russian diplomacy at present is to prevent the Iran issue from going to the UN Security Council," said Vladimir Yevseyev, coordinator of the nuclear non-proliferation program at the Carnegie Moscow Center political research institute.
"Russia does not want to lose Iran. Russia will do whatever possible to stop this decision," he said.
Confident assertions by European and US diplomats that Russia has dropped its long-standing resistance to referring Iran to the Security Council are ill-informed and reflect a misreading of the Russian political mix predicating Moscow's policy on the issue, experts say.
Moscow's continued reticence about referring Iran to the UN Security Council was underscored on Tuesday by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who said that sanctions were "not the best and by no means the only way" to resolve the Iran nuclear standoff.
In addition to payments reportedly in excess of US$1 billion that Russian state and private firms will receive under contracts to help Iran build and launch its first civilian nuclear power station, Moscow is determined to nurture its long-term business and economic interests in Iran.
Chances for doing so would disintegrate quickly and permanently if Russia were to walk away from Iran now, the experts explain.
"In attempting to curb Iran's nuclear program, Western countries are also deciding another issue: the removal of Russia from Iran's lucrative energy market," said Radzhab Safarov, director of the Moscow-based Center for Iranian Research and an adviser to the Russian State Duma.
"Construction of the Bushehr nuclear plant is not only economically profitable for Moscow -- it also strengthens its long-term influence in Iran, a key country in the Islamic world and a strategic partner for Russia," Safarov said in an interview with the daily Vremya.
"It is not hard to imagine how Tehran will react, and what will happen to Russia's image, if, in this difficult period for Iran, it sides with the West and votes for sanctions," he said.
Referral of the Iran nuclear issue to the UN Security Council represents a no-win situation for Russia as this could lead to a vote on sanctions against Tehran, forcing Moscow into a stark choice between staying friendly with the West or protecting its many other interests linked to Iran.
For Moscow, that choice is by no means the "no brainer" that some Western officials seem to think it should be, as the Kremlin sees, in its relationship with Tehran, direct links to stability on Russia's southern flanks in the Caucasus and Central Asia.
For instance: Iran, around one-third of whose population is of ethnic Azeri origin, has de facto influence on stability in the ex-Soviet republic of Azerbaijan, which in turn plays an important stabilizing role in the wider Caucasus region, including inside southern Russia itself.
"Iran could easily destabilize the situation in Azerbaijan," Yevseyev said.
He added that good ties between Moscow and Tehran helped keep in check moves by the US to boost its own presence there.
Another example: Iran has particularly close ties with the former Soviet republic of Tajikistan, where much of the population in the south and west of the country derives from ethnic groups also indigenous to Iran.
"Both Russia and Iran have interests in Central Asia and Russia does not want to see Iran's position grow stronger there," Yevseyev said.
He noted that Russia was also facing increasing competition from China for influence in the region.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the