It was with great dismay and shame that I read your article ("Despite hardships, foreign workers stay on in Taiwan,'" Jan 16, page 2) on foreign workers. What a tale of greed, incompetence and corruption. Unscrupulous and greedy people, or rather vultures, prey upon helpless guest workers. The corruption is endemic and systemic.
The situation in which these workers find themselves is something out of a Dickens novel. They are treated like indentured servants at best or forced labor prisoners at worst. These people come from countries mired in poverty with little or no opportunities.
Honest, diligent and hard working, these men and women are prepared to sacrifice years of their lives, and separation from friends and family in order to be able to send back the pittance they are able to save. They come to Taiwan, a modern, free, democratic country, with rule of law, to take those jobs that locals would never accept -- the dirty, backbreaking work that sustains the nation's prosperity. What do these migrant workers find upon arrival?
They quickly discover that they are exploited, mistreated, robbed and deprived of all right to legal redress. Seventy hour weeks are not uncommon for virtual slave labor, with a tiny fraction of overtime pay. Salary? NT$15,000 per month (up to NT$20,000 with incredible amounts of overtime) or less than half the local salary (if and when they are paid), even if locals would take such work.
These workers have to deal with brokers who take NT$1,500 to NT$1,800 per month, an amount "set by law" to handle workers documents, taxes, etc, but frequently take more and offer few if any benefits. In other words these positions have become licenses to steal. Where are the government, courts, human-rights organizations?
Now that these workers have been overworked and bled fairly dry, they face inflated service charges for bedding, meals, etc. After a month of these conditions, they can add up what is left and send funds back home to desperate families.
When workers rioted in Kaohsiung over these very conditions, the so-called ringleaders were quickly hustled out of the country, as they had no legal rights, and their employers were hardly eager to have their despicable activities placed under public scrutiny.
They had been cheated and remained unpaid for months, while their letter of grievance sat in some official's desk drawer. It seems that those at the Council of Labor Affairs, the police and the courts have no trouble living with these conditions. Is this due to incompetence, corruption or simply heartlessness?
So guest workers, welcome to Taiwan, a democratic nation of laws, but apparently little justice. One can't help but wonder who is next. Perhaps we could import the starving who would be willing to work for rice!
Russian President Vladimir Putin is an expert at bluffing and keeping the West on its toes, pushing relations to the edge before pivoting without warning. However, hemmed in and fuming, he is deadly serious about being heard on Ukraine. Those close to the Kremlin said that the Russian president does not want to start another war in Ukraine. Still, he must show he is ready to fight if necessary in order to stop what he sees as an existential security threat: the creeping expansion of the NATO in a country that for centuries had been part of Russia. After years of disillusionment
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) sixth plenary session has ended and from all appearances, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has set the stage to rule for the rest of his life. Some might be tempted to declare that this calls for Xi to do a victory lap, but all is not well on the other side of the Taiwan Strait. To parody a line from Ya Got Trouble, a song from Broadway musical The Music Man: “There’s trouble in River City, (aka, Beijing). Trouble with a capital T, which rhymes with C for CCP.” Why? Taking control of a nation is always much
When analyzing Taiwan-China tensions, most people assume that the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consists of rational actors. Embedded within this belief are three further suppositions: First, Beijing would only launch an attack on Taiwan if it were in China’s national interest; second, it would only attack if the odds were overwhelmingly in its favor; and third, Chinese decisionmakers interpret information objectively and through the same lens as other actors. These assumptions have underpinned recent analyses — including by Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) — concluding that there is no
Frequent incidents of violence in society, such as a near-fatal assault with baseball bats in Taichung and a deadly shooting in New Taipei City, are making people anxious. Media commentators blame police chiefs and mayors, calling for their resignations. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said she would review the situation and take firmer action, such as the Cabinet calling a conference on law and order, and proposing countermeasures, while former New Power Party legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has urged the government to declare “war” on gangsters, and not just as a slogan. When thugs get into brawls and beat up or even kill