It was sad to see a political party with a glorious past such as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) register a voter turnout of just 19.96 percent in its chairmanship election on Sunday. It was an indication of the DPP rank and file's indifference to the election and the party's leadership should take note.
The major task facing chairman-elect Yu Shyi-kun is rekindling party member enthusiasm. The party's rank and file were a vigorous force before the DPP gained power in 2000, backing the nation's first localized political party in its fight for democracy as it challenged the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government of the time.
Unfortunately, since the DPP's defeats in the 2004 legislative elections and last month's local government elections, morale has collapsed. If the party fails to regain its spirit and reinvigorate its leadership in the face of these setbacks, it is likely to lose the Taipei and Kaohsiung mayoral elections at the end of the year. The follow-on from this is the likelihood that the presidency will be handed back to the KMT in 2008, precipitating a crisis within the DPP.
In light of the DPP's contribution to democracy in Asia, it is disheartening to see the party sullied by corruption and abuse of power by a few of its members. Beyond that, the party's hesitation and indecisiveness regarding the best way to safeguard Taiwan have also betrayed the expectations of many of its supporters.
This has led to a waning in the public's enthusiasm toward deepening democratic development and social reform, contributing to pessimism about the nation's future. This has undermined the public's faith in the possibility of building a real community.
In the face of these challenges, Yu's role is crucial. He must transcend factional disputes within the party and listen to the grassroots. Only in this way will he be able to act as a conduit between ordinary party members and the leadership, and regain the trust of the rank and file. He also has to rebuild the party's image and be willing to adopt strict measures against any colleagues who are guilty of corruption.
Those involved in corruption or abuse of power, or who are guilty of vote-buying, should be ejected from the party and evidence against them handed over to the authorities. Any kind of protection or hesitation in punishing wrong-doing will only damage the party's reputation further.
The founding members of the DPP -- who braved prison sentences and sacrificed everything to establish a party that could speak for the people of Taiwan and fight for democracy -- can only be deeply disappointed about the situation the party is in today. Yu once said that he had the spirit of a water buffalo. Now is the time for him to show the simplicity, tireless effort and industriousness that that image implies -- to revive the party and allow the nation's democracy to be passed to future generations.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS