US shouldn't side with China
As a Taiwanese-US grassroots organization promoting freedom and democracy for the people of Taiwan we would like to register our deep concern about a statement reportedly made by a "senior Bush administration official" who is "closely involved in cross-strait affairs."
The official recently gave a briefing to the Chinese-language Liberty Times in which he "emphasized that the two sides of the Strait have continued to avoid direct official dialogue, and that if Taiwan was not willing to make concessions on cross-strait economic policy, and refused to move ahead with direct links with Beijing, it would not be in the best interests of the US" ("US disappointed by cross-strait ties: official," Jan. 8, page 3).
What disturbs us in this statement is that the onus for the lack of dialogue is put on the government in Taiwan. As is well known, President Chen Shui-bian's (
China has continued to impose its unreasonable "one China" condition on Taipei, which basically requires Taiwan to surrender its sovereignty before talks can even start. This is obviously unacceptable.
More disturbingly, the statement implies that it is the US position that Taiwan should make concessions and move toward direct links with China, while no mention is made of any concessions from China or moderation of its stance.
The US is certainly aware of the fact that China is threatening Taiwan with military force, including some 780 missiles.
A step in the right direction would be for China to dismantle the missiles and renounce the use of military force. The Bush administration would do well to focus on those aspects.
As US citizens of Taiwanese descent we believe that the US should avoid siding with China, and should be more supportive of a free and democratic Taiwan.
C.T. Lee
President of the Formosan
Association for Public
Affairs, Washington
Follow up on reserves
In a recent "Quick Take" column there was a short article on changes in the rules for entry to nature reserves ("Rules for nature reserves," Jan. 8, page 3).
It would be great if the paper could follow up on this by providing further information on how and where members of the public can register to enter nature reserves, or even if this is still possible.
Conservation of natural resources is important and the government should be commended for taking further steps to preserve Taiwan's unique biodiversity. I support efforts to tighten entry requirements to nature reserves, but at the same time I hope that if the rules are followed, ordinary people will still be allowed to visit and enjoy these wild areas.
For it is only on land with intact, working ecosystems that one can gain some insight into the complexity, interrelatedness and beauty of nature.
Dan Chamberlin
Taipei
Let the pandas in
Bring the pandas to Taiwan! Sure, they're pretty dull to watch (what can you say about an animal that faces extinction because it can't be bothered to mate?), but the same is true for koalas.
The koalas at the Taipei Zoo might as well be stuffed for all the entertainment value they offer, but all those koala T-shirts, balloons and assorted paraphernalia have kept Taiwan's economy afloat for years. And the pandas bring hope for unemployed local actors as well: Have the pandas regularly guest star on local soap operas and Korean soaps will have to start featuring Bigfoot or something in order to compete. Everybody wins!
Jonathan Brody
Taipei
Local soap operas are vulgar
I am not a fan of Korean soap operas, but I was really surprised by the Government Information Office's (GIO) announcement that it plans to restrict the number of foreign soap operas on prime-time television.
Honestly, I have avoided Taiwanese soap operas for years because I have had enough of their hideous nonsense and weak storylines. I also worry that children will begin to imitate the actors' vulgar language and violent behavior.
Shortly after the GIO's announcement, I heard that some performers and directors have been complaining about how they have suffered as a result of the invasion of foreign soap operas. Unfortunately, these people don't seem to think about why they are unable to compete in the entertainment market.
More than 10 years ago, Taiwan started importing Japanese soap operas. Local viewers loved these programs' solid and short plot lines. Later, Chinese soap operas, too, were shown in Taiwan and people praised the programs for their sophisticated quality.
Currently, Korean soap operas are all the rage as a result of the fact that they are well shot and feature diverse storylines without using drawn-out delay tactics.
Rather than complaining about the threat posed by foreign soap operas, Taiwanese producers should consider how to improve the quality of their programs in order to regain the public's interest.
Lai Shu-Mei
Taichung
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers