In 1937, the Taiwanese author Yang Kuei (楊逵) published the novel Model Village (模範村) in which he describes a small community that has been "awarded" model village status. The Matsu and Kuanyin figurines in many homes "had been forcefully removed by the authorities and replaced with Japanese altars." The character Han Chin-fu (憨金福) tries to bribe the Japanese officials to soften the policy, but "not only did he not gain any benefits, he had to pay a substantial sum." The result was that he ended up dead. The inspiration for Yang's novel were the events that took place in 1935, when imperial Japan held a "Taiwan Exhibition" to display its benevolent rule of Taiwan to the world. Yang's novel exposed the cruel reality behind the "model village" concept.
In fact, in the 18th and 19th centuries, it was normal for imperialist countries to see colonialism as a good thing. France, for instance, saw the conquest of Egypt as an act of benevolence. Napoleon Bonaparte even said that "France is the only Muslim who truly follows Islam" and made Egypt a model village to show off France's greatness. It was also during this period that colonialists began to collect strange animals from their colonies and place them in pretty animal parks to show off their good governance. The zoo thus became the model village of imperialism.
It is a tragedy that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
In his article Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of Taiwan's Retrocession, Ma criticizes Japan, saying that "the beautiful appearance of its colonial construct was built on cruelty and oppression," while also claiming that "equal opportunity was the greatest social capital bequeathed by the KMT government to Taiwan." He made it clear that the people of Taiwan should return the favor and called Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水), Lai Ho (賴和) and Yang Kuei "model students" who proved that "Taiwan's localization movement is nothing but a movement to build the Republic of China."
Ma then said in his article Becoming a Normal Democratic Society that "the people of Taiwan have proven that China is capable of building a democracy." What is the difference between this kind of "proof" and a patriarchal society where fathers sacrifice sons and daughters, and men take the lives of women, to show their power?
This kind of authoritarian language from Ma, who is also mayor of a city on a once colonial island, is not much different from the language of Napoleon Bonaparte. At this point in time, the Chinese dictators have decided to cooperate with Ma by giving Taiwan two "diplomatic model students" -- the two pandas. Accepting this gift would be no different to letting the world know that Taiwan has accepted a benevolent gift from authoritarian China and is willing to become a model village of Chinese imperialism.
Could Taiwan really be fated to become a model village for imperialism? Will Taiwan one day be given as a gift to China in the same way as China now is offering Taiwan two pandas? After all, Ma has already declared that "[cross-strait] unification is the ultimate goal of the Chinese Nationalist Party."
Given China's history of more than 2,000 years of dictatorial totalitarianism and patriarchal culture, it is not surprising that authoritarian modes of thought such as Ma's would appear. What is surprising, however, is that many Taiwanese seem to approve -- which shows that human rights have not yet taken root in Taiwan.
Bob Kuo is a professor of Information Systems at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers