Your editorial ("A perversion of justice," Jan. 6, page 8) displays a very simplistic view of right and wrong -- as well as some circular logic. Yang Ju-men (楊儒門) was certainly misguided and his actions were unequivocally criminal; of course his methods could not be "endorsed by any reasonable individual."
However, as many people have pointed out over the centuries, ordinary people don't resort to such things without extraordinary provocation -- any animal backed into a corner tends to get violent, and humans are no exception.
The Taiwan High Court decision was the decision of wise men. The law is not a definition of right and wrong but simply an instrument of social control. Many countries have had -- and still have -- laws which are immoral or have the opposite of the intended effect.
History is full of people who have opposed these laws and were called cranks, criminals, "tired old Marxists" and worse at the time. Yet their efforts have made society a better place.
I am surprised that your editorial writer would be so dismissive of such people, given Taiwan's not-so-distant history of oppression.
As for the WTO, this organization was set up primarily by rich nations to benefit rich nations, and has already done immense harm to those nations not in the clique. This is a great shame, because globalization is not inherently bad -- some products are better produced in some locations than others.
In the case of Taiwan, she is being compelled to buy foreign rice, which is unnecessary and also inferior to the local product.
And if anyone has ever seen a Taiwanese farmer who is "consumed by greed" and "dependent on government subsidies to keep themselves in the manner to which they are accustomed," perhaps this newspaper could publish a photograph of that farmer's sprawling mansions and numerous cars alongside, for example, a picture of the chairman of the Riceland Foods co-operative (which receives a yearly average of more than US$50 million in US government subsidies).
WTO membership has done little to help Taiwan's exporters while flooding the country with pointless imported stuff -- SUVs are another good example. They may be a good idea in the US but are dangerous, polluting and a waste of fuel and space in a country as cramped as Taiwan.
The sad part about Yang's case is that he saw the problems but believed violence was his only option. He was wrong.
For those Taiwanese who do not wish to further line the pockets of rich foreigners and would prefer to see their own society prosper, the solution is simple: Don't buy this stuff.
Buy Taiwanese rice and vegetables -- they taste better. Buy Japanese small cars instead of SUVs -- they're much easier to handle, more fuel-efficient and nobody will make jokes about what men with big cars might be compensating for.
Applying some simple consumer common sense will ensure that world trade agreements make globalization a good thing rather than a profiteering racket.
Tony Weir
Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past