The Taiwanese legislature has just passed a bill on media reform, but long-standing, unresolved problems remain.
Taiwan has more than a dozen TV news channels broadcasting live pictures and telling sensational stories without proper fact-checking -- a high density of media outlets for just 23 million people.
The legislature has been working on ridding the media of the influence of such interest groups as political parties and the military. But the general public simply wants good journalism in line with international standards. Since Hong Kong publications like the Apple Daily and Next Magazine launched their Taiwanese versions, major Taiwanese daily papers that used to be a lot more serious have become paparazzi-like, with juicy, graphic photos creeping onto their front pages.
Further degrading the local media scene is the fresh-out-of-college, inexperienced but telegenic TV journalists and anchorpersons who have no choice but to adapt as quickly as possible to the "real world of media" by completing the missions assigned by their always-barking bosses. These rookie journalists always find themselves chasing people whose quotes scarcely matter.
In a tiny market like Taiwan, a major part of the daily work schedule of any media executive includes wooing advertisers. It's the hard-earned advertising dollars that keep media organizations above water. As a result, specialists in the sales department of any media outlet enjoy greater leverage than their editorial counterparts. This is so evident that more and more aspiring media talents -- many of whom are in a position to provide for their families -- are making a detour to job offers as PR coordinators or marketing specialists in either the public or private sector.
Well-trained media professionals are consequently staying away from jobs where they used to monitor the government and benefit the masses, with only ill-prepared recent graduates stumbling to feed viewers and readers with scandal-mongering and careless reports.
For reporters, editors and producers, the real aim of media reform should be the determination to do better-quality journalism, rather than hastily passing any more media bills in the raucous, bickering Legislative Yuan.
Cheng Kai-chun
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers