Reports that hundreds of staff at the Beijing News are on strike are intriguing indeed. The reason for the strike was the removal of editor-in-chief Yang Bin (
The incident shows that press freedom has not just failed to increase under President Hu Jintao (
One example of such control is the blocking of access to virtually all news Web sites from Taiwan. This means that there is no access in China to either yahoo.com.tw or even online Taiwanese bookstores such as books.com.tw.
The move against the Beijing News follows the sacking of the editor-in-chief at the Southern Metropolitan News for running a story on the government's punishment of a Guangzhou provincial official after a mining accident.
It was not the first time that an editor-in-chief at the Beijing News was removed for irritating the government with its news coverage. Yang's predecessor was thrown in jail on the grounds of having an "economic problem."
The good news to come out of this is that Chinese readers are becoming more conscious of -- and dissatisfied with -- the way that their rights are being trampled on by their government. It takes guts to go on strike over such matters in China -- where police can throw people in jail on groundless charges of threatening the national security, and all in the absence of due process.
The reason cited by the government for the personnel change at the Beijing News was "political security" -- a typically lame excuse used to arrest people or suppress opponents or perceived irritants. Some believe that stories published by the Beijing News in June last year relating to an incident of rural unrest that led to the death of six villagers and more than 100 injured may have been the last straw. The newspaper had been warned by the government already for its candid coverage.
The popularity of newspapers known for publishing critiques of social issues and coverage of social discontent suggests that there is strong demand for knowledge among average Chinese. Beijing News itself is very popular among intellectuals and white-collar workers.
Such a demand for free information by the general public is typically a precursor to further political liberalization. This demand will only grow stronger as China continues to open up economically and increasing amounts of information from the outside world become accessible.
The Chinese leadership is manifestly anxious about allowing a more autonomous press to develop, which explains the recent clampdown on the news media. The interesting question is how long the drive for more freedom and less government interference can be suppressed by the government without bringing the formidable amount of unrest occurring in the countryside into the cities.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS