The issue of political parties and the military withdrawing from local media ownership is as old as the nation's democratic movement. But we must return to this old topic because, despite a transfer in executive power, media interference has not been dealt with.
If the problem is allowed to spread, the media will become a needless source of confrontation rather than a force for justice that speaks for the public. Foreign interests may also seize the chance to manipulate the nation's domestic affairs, weakening the national fabric, worsening cross-party tensions and bringing about the dissolution of the community into which the Taiwanese have invested so much emotion and determination.
If political forces do not withdraw from management of the media, the Fourth Estate -- the pillar that supports a modern democratic and civil society -- will not be able to fully exercise its function of monitoring the government. The media may also regress into a plaything of a select few, manipulated to deceive the public, create confrontation and attack those with dissenting views. Many existing outlets did these very things during the martial-law era when they helped the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) oppress their own people. Such shameful history cannot be allowed to repeat itself.
Unfortunately, the problem has not been rooted out. It remains a malign presence that can make itself felt at any time. The opposition majority in the Legislative Yuan has repeatedly blocked a draft law relating to the public ownership of terrestrial TV stations. The Ministry of National Defense has also failed to ask the Liming Cultural Enterprise Foundation -- in which it has a guiding hand -- to divest itself of shares in the Chinese Television System (CTS).
Now that CTS is under the management of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, its managers have stated that they see it as their duty to turn the station into a pan-green outlet that can balance the control the pan-blue camp has over other channels. This confusion of values shows just how incapable the government and the opposition are in hiding their ambitions to control the media.
With the nation's media so politicized, there is little legal basis for opposing political interference, and loopholes are constantly exploited. It is through these loopholes that China has found a way into the domestic market, buying up traditional and electronic media under the guise of foreign capital and producing programs via local agents. In this way Beijing exerts a divisive influence on Taiwanese society and uses "authoritative sources" to expose dealings within the DPP.
The government and the opposition should be aware of the dangers of political influence in the media and work unselfishly to establish legislation to prevent this. If not, foreign powers and their local hired guns will make use of this nation's environment of free speech to attack their enemies, and the government will be powerless to respond.
Even the National Communications Commission will be unable to improve the situation when it becomes operational.
In April 1989, publisher Cheng Nan-jung (
Politicians would do well to reflect on that sacrifice and work to remove political skulduggery from media operations and prevent foreign interests from influencing domestic politics. Only then can democracy in Taiwan have real substance.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS