Ever since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lost the Dec. 3 local government elections, those who care about Taiwan and pro-localization political parties have called on the DPP to get serious about reform and win back popular support. Until it does, it cannot stand up to the ever-growing threat posed by China.
The party cannot allow this defeat to tear apart localization forces within the nation. Such an outcome would only boost the momentum of the pro-China forces, with serious implications for the next generation. In the space of just a few days following the election, the party leadership was plunged into internal conflict. In fact, the infighting within the party has descended into farce -- which doesn't bode well for the future of Taiwan.
Having suffered the recent election debacle, the DPP did indeed show signs of wanting to change. DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (
Following the elections, Chen even mentioned in a public speech the importance of reforming the 18 percent preferential rates enjoyed by retired public servants.
Regrettably, these attempts to revamp the party were but a flash in the pan. In the last few days we saw an even more ludicrous farce unfold when Chen asked Premier Frank Hsieh (
This didn't stop Hsieh and his aides from telling the media that he had accepted Chen's request to remain in office. In view of this, we cannot help but wonder if Hsieh has truly understood the negative impact that the government's failings had on the elections, or if he ever really intended to resign from his post.
The second farce took place when Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
Moreover, the president should not care too much about who fills the acting chairperson post. Unfortunately, the misunderstanding between Chen and Lu is so serious that it has deteriorated into a long litany of criticisms about each other made through the media.
Voters have taught the DPP a lesson in the recent poll, in the hope that the party can genuinely pursue reform, hold on to the drive toward localization, address its failings and continue to fight for Taiwanese awareness. While conducting an internal review, the DPP should discuss the future development of the party, what ideals the party should uphold, and the policy it wants to follow to appeal to the public. It needs to consider how to ensure and protect the interests of all Taiwanese if it is to live up to their expectations.
However, Hsieh's claims of being asked to stay on as premier and the verbal brawl between Chen and Lu just go to show how DPP heavyweights are scrambling for power, even to the extent that they have allowed themselves a public display of emotions. This has not only shifted the focus away from reform itself, it has also offended the party's supporters.
To be sure, even if the DPP was united, it still might not be able to defeat the KMT, currently led by Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in the 2008 presidential elections. Given this fact, it is very disappointing to see the president and the vice president engaging in such pointless bickering.
Therefore, these two national leaders must stop their quarreling. The DPP should also review its policies as well as its morals to regain people's confidence. If this farce is allowed to continue, the nation will only plunge into turmoil, with DPP supporters eventually abandoning the party.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers