"Grow up!" is the sort of thing you would say to a college student who was whining about missing his favorite TV program.
It's hard to imagine that you would need to say such a thing to the leaders of a country.
But as funny, or as sad, as it may sound, this is the exact phrase that comes to mind in light of the unseemly exchanges between President Chen Shui-bian (
Having accepted the nomination as interim party chairperson during a regular meeting of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Central Standing Committee last Wednesday, Lu abruptly announced her decision to resign from the post in a press release on Monday night.
While the row over the acting chairmanship seems to have abated somewhat as a result of Lu's decision yesterday to withdraw her resignation and accept her party comrades' calls for her to stay on in the post, the incident has led to much interest in the relationship between the president and the vice president.
It has been speculated that Lu initially decided to quit as interim party chairperson in response to a media report which claimed that the president had Jao Yung-ching (
The cancelation of a routine meeting between Chen and Lu on Monday added to the speculation that the president was not in favor of Lu's decision to accept the position.
Saying that she had been willing to "endure all sorts of scathing criticism" since taking up the interim post because she had wanted to "bolster the battered party after the just-concluded elections," Lu in her Monday statement noted that she had decided to quit because she saw party reform as "a distant and elusive goal" and did not wish to make herself a sacrifice on "the altar of struggle" between various party factions.
Subsequently, Chen, in a statement issued late on Tuesday night addressing the turmoil that resulted from Lu's abrupt resignation the day before, stressed that he would not tolerate rumors suggesting that he was trying to control the party's decision-making process on major party affairs.
Apart from her very public differences with Chen, Lu's conduct since assuming the interim post has been quite refreshing as her positive demeanor has shown that the electoral defeat is not the end of the world for the party and she has done much to alleviate the gloomy atmosphere that had lingered over the DPP since election day.
In defense of Chen and Lu's unseemly behavior, it must be remembered that politicians, and even presidents, are human, and susceptible to emotions and weaknesses such as anger, jealousy and over-excitement.
However, as the Greek poet Alcaeus once said, "Language exerts hidden power, like a moon on the tides."
The nation's top two leaders might keep this ancient wisdom in mind if they want to avoid allowing their public rhetoric to turn the DPP's internal turmoil into a soap opera for the entertainment of the party's critics.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS