On Monday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
While a formal merger is not about to take place anytime soon, further downsizing of the PFP is inevitable as more members abandon it to return to the KMT.
Particularly motivating for those in the PFP who have been pining for positions of influence was the example set by Taipei County commissioner-elect Chou Hsi-wei (
At the time Chou left the PFP, he faced a lot of skepticism. After all, the PFP and Soong had been very good to him, and yet he chose to leave the party when it was about to disintegrate -- in line with the decline of Soong's popularity among constituents.
However, none of that seems to matter anymore.
By helping the pan-blues retake Taipei County 16 years after it was first lost to the Democratic Progressive Party, Chou has become a hero -- at least to some. Under the circumstances, no wonder the rumblings from within the PFP in favor of a merger are getting louder. Differences within the PFP between opponents and supporters of the merger are about to come to the surface.
Soong must feel disheartened. Still, there is just no incentive for him and his gang to opt for a merger. What can they possibly get out of it?
Meanwhile, things are looking up for Ma after leading his party to victory in the local elections. The Ma era in the KMT has arrived and there is no room for Soong. In particular, Soong is seen as being from the generation before Ma. It would be insulting for him to return to the KMT if it meant that he had to settle for a position beneath Ma.
The best shot left for Soong is to run for Taipei mayor. This is something that he would not have considered before. After all, he had already served as governor of Taiwan Province and Ma, someone junior to him, is finishing off a second term as Taipei mayor. However, as a politician, Soong needs a stage where he can perform and win support. Serving as Taipei mayor would do exactly that. The PFP needs Soong's personal allure and charisma to continue, so Soong must make a run for it.
While Soong may not be willing to merge the PFP with the KMT, some level of cooperation is still required -- in the legislature, the upcoming elections and so on -- even if it is only for show to please die-hard pan-blue supporters. So the meeting on Monday was necessary, even though nothing substantive was apparently discussed. But a second meeting was not scheduled, and no mechanism for regular negotiation was established.
As far as the KMT and Ma are concerned, there is no need to concern themselves too much about the lack of progress toward merging. Given time, most PFP members will return to the fold.
Politics can be cruel sometimes.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath