The conflict over the future of Taiwan is usually seen as a triangular struggle between China, Taiwan -- where the majority seeks to retain their separation from China -- and the US, which is Taiwan's security guarantor.
That is changing, contends a new study by the National Bureau of Asian Research, a non-partisan institute in Seattle. It argues that the Taiwan question has become quadrangular, with Japan having become the fourth nation directly engaged in potentially the most explosive clash in Asia.
Japan's entry into the Taiwan issue is yet another indication of Tokyo's active emergence in Asian international relations after decades of taking a pacifist and passive stance, or what the Japanese call "low posture."
Moreover, the study suggests that East Asia is becoming ever more divided into Chinese and US blocs. Specifically, it says, "if a military confrontation occurred between the US and China over Taiwan, US policymakers can rest assured of Japan's support."
US President George W. Bush seemed to underscore Japan's new position on Taiwan last month in a speech he made in Kyoto, Japan's ancient capital, by including warm praise for Taiwan. He applauded Taiwan for having "moved from repression to democracy as it liberalized its economy." Bush lauded the people of Taiwan for being "free, democratic and prosperous." The Chinese, who insist that the Taiwan issue is an internal question of no concern to the US, were not pleased.
The assessment of Japan-Taiwan relations was written by two retired US naval officers experienced in Asian affairs, Michael McDevitt and James Auer; two Japanese academics, Yoshihide Soeya of Keio University and Tetsuo Kotani of Doshisha University; and Philip Yang (楊永明) of National Taiwan University.
The study asserts that: "Taiwan's quiet initiative to push for a greater level of informal defense contacts with Japan arises in no small part from shared history and democratic values, common strategic constraints and island threat environments, as well as the close relations that Tokyo and Taipei maintain with the US."
The shared history relates to Japan's colonial rule of Taiwan from 1895 to 1945 after the nation was ceded by China following Japan's victory in the Sino-Japanese War. Japan's control is generally considered to have been quite benign despite several harsh episodes during the early period.
Strategically, Taiwan sits astride Japan's trade routes through Southeast Asia to the Persian Gulf, a key source of oil, and on through the Suez Canal to markets in Europe. The US is tied to Taiwan by the Taiwan Relations Act, which requires Washington to help defend Taiwan; Tokyo has a security treaty with the US.
In taking this initiative, the authors say, "Taiwan has skillfully seized diplomatic leverage from China, the US, and Japan, and has used this power to promote an agenda that often tests the bounds of Beijing's tolerance."
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), however, may have overplayed his hand. In local elections earlier this month, his Democratic Progressive Party was soundly beaten by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Chen appears to have made voters worry that he might provoke China into military action against Taiwan.
Japanese sympathy for Taiwan has risen since the end of the Cold War, Soeya writes, because of the "deterioration of political and security relations between Japan and China, and Taiwan's steady democratization." He points to several dialogues between Taiwanese and Japanese legislators and favorable press coverage.
Yang writes that behind the new Japanese attitudes is a postwar generation of politicians who "believe that World War II should no longer haunt Japan's relations with its neighbors but see in China a determined unwillingness to forget the past." Bashing Japan, he says, has "become part of the political culture in China."
From the US' point of view, McDevitt says, the success of democracy in Taiwan has tipped the political balance in the US in favor of support for an embattled democracy. Before, the US seemed indifferent to Taiwan's plight.
US military leaders, however, are losing patience with Taiwan's refusal to conclude an arms purchase to which Washington agreed four years ago.
Last week, the opposition parties in the legislature, led by the KMT, voted for the 40th time not to place the arms deal on the agenda so that it could be debated and voted on.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers