The results of the Dec. 3 three-in-one elections were undoubtedly a huge blow to President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Despite the fact that they were local elections, the poor handling of the negative impact of former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan's (陳哲男) misconduct, the Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corp (KRTC) scandal and the "vultures" insider-trading case involving DPP leaders resulted in a huge loss of public trust in Chen and his party.
The fact that the DPP was not defeated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) but by itself deserves more attention. Once the voters begin to question the DPP's integrity and hold the party's misconduct up against the principles of honesty and morality, it will be hard for the government to regain the electorate's support for the party's long-stated goal of upholding clean politics.
Most importantly, Taiwanese people placed high hopes on Chen and the DPP largely because they believed that a DPP government would do better than the corrupt KMT and would bring about reform. While the DPP continues to disappoint by emulating the bad behavior of the old KMT regime, it would naturally receive a stronger backlash from voters who have supported it in the past.
After failing to secure a clear majority in the legislative elections last year, Chen and his government have faced consistent domestic boycotts from the pan-blue camp and cross-strait ones from Beijing. It is going to take greater courage and determination -- and more importantly, a readjustment of leadership -- for Chen to reset the agenda and reframe policy goals in accordance with the political reality and the public's wishes.
A Cabinet reshuffle is a must. The most effective way to regain public trust in the government is to find a premier who can introduce discipline and a team-work ethic to the Cabinet.
Moreover, just because Chen's approval rate has reached a historical low of less than 18 percent it does not mean that he needs to make unnecessary concessions to the pan-blue camp. One of the main contributing factors to the election loss for the administration was the total lack of efficiency in implementing major reforms. Chen must utilize the remainder of his term to accelerate the reforms he touched on in his Double Ten National Day speech.
Chen must also continue to execute the reforms he promised during the campaign, including reform of the pension system, constitutional structure and taxation. Internally, Chen must perform the role of a mediator between the diverse and pluralistic social forces and forge a unified Taiwan.
Chen must also incorporate stronger leadership, determined action and the art of political bargaining into his leadership. Amid great pressure at home and abroad, Chen must be conciliatory without seeming weak, strong without appearing hostile.
Chen must also relentlessly defend Taiwan's national interests as a sovereign and independent nation. While most pressure will be placed on him to continue opening up toward China, pragmatism and caution are needed, particularly when it comes to policy adjustment.
Chen should also keep in mind that a political leader does not just need public support to win elections; he needs it to govern.
Chen should use the nation's craving for cross-party reconciliation and regional concern for cross-strait peace and invite all the leaders from different political parties and social groups to join together.
Only by molding a unified Taiwan can he forge a strong and democratic country. And only by working harder and by regaining public trust can Chen and his government make a turnaround from their present lowly position.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US