The "three-in-one" local government elections will soon be upon us, and with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) reeling from recent scandals, and trouble stirred up by the press and unscrupulous opposition politicians, things are getting tense. Some pan-green supporters and swing voters don't consider these elections to be important. This, together with voter apathy induced by the government's poor record and disillusionment over recent scandals, means DPP voters are more likely to stay away from the polls to punish the party.
This is dangerous. If the DPP does badly in these polls we could see the collapse of democracy and freedom in Taiwan. This is not mere scare-mongering.
First, in this election the Taiwanese are up against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). When former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) agreed to join forces with the CCP in order to suppress Taiwanese independence, he was effectively joining ranks with the bandits and hooligans working against Taiwan.
But how exactly are they going to achieve this? Through elections. If the pan-blues win, they will be in a better position to help the CCP control Taiwan through legal means. From what we have seen of the oppressive and callous way Beijing treats its own people, there is little doubt that this will only lead to the loss of Taiwan's democracy and freedom.
Second, some believe that things have changed now that Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Third, despite the seeming lack of importance of these elections, the central government needs the support of local governments, especially when it is facing an opposition which has a majority in the legislature. If local governments come under the control of the pro-China factions, it will spell disaster for the pan-green camp in the next legislative and presidential elections.
Fourth, the CCP's tentacles are already finding their way into grassroots Taiwanese society. They invited many county and city councilors to China to discuss imports of Taiwanese agricultural products, only to allegedly offer them bribes. This is just one example.
At the moment the pan-blues are pulling out all the stops to do well in these elections, creating scandals and inciting rumors. Rumors of homosexuality among party members have been used to court sympathy, Lee Teng-hui was hit with a NT$10 million (US$298,000) fine for defamation, and a raid of a private residence seized VCDs critical of the KMT and brought the maker in for questioning.
Trying to quash the voice of anyone who doesn't happen to agree with you smacks of the CCP. It is known as "white terror." Do you see those individuals making noises about "green terror" being dragged in for questioning by the DPP? If they are given even the slightest amount of power on the local government level they will do everything they can not only to reinstate the KMT as lords of the party-state system, but to work with Beijing to bring a new era of "red terror" to Taiwan.
I would suggest that Taiwan's voters, irrespective of whether they support the pan-green or pan-blue camp, think carefully about whether they want this.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS