The "three-in-one" local government elections will soon be upon us, and with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) reeling from recent scandals, and trouble stirred up by the press and unscrupulous opposition politicians, things are getting tense. Some pan-green supporters and swing voters don't consider these elections to be important. This, together with voter apathy induced by the government's poor record and disillusionment over recent scandals, means DPP voters are more likely to stay away from the polls to punish the party.
This is dangerous. If the DPP does badly in these polls we could see the collapse of democracy and freedom in Taiwan. This is not mere scare-mongering.
First, in this election the Taiwanese are up against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). When former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) agreed to join forces with the CCP in order to suppress Taiwanese independence, he was effectively joining ranks with the bandits and hooligans working against Taiwan.
But how exactly are they going to achieve this? Through elections. If the pan-blues win, they will be in a better position to help the CCP control Taiwan through legal means. From what we have seen of the oppressive and callous way Beijing treats its own people, there is little doubt that this will only lead to the loss of Taiwan's democracy and freedom.
Second, some believe that things have changed now that Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Third, despite the seeming lack of importance of these elections, the central government needs the support of local governments, especially when it is facing an opposition which has a majority in the legislature. If local governments come under the control of the pro-China factions, it will spell disaster for the pan-green camp in the next legislative and presidential elections.
Fourth, the CCP's tentacles are already finding their way into grassroots Taiwanese society. They invited many county and city councilors to China to discuss imports of Taiwanese agricultural products, only to allegedly offer them bribes. This is just one example.
At the moment the pan-blues are pulling out all the stops to do well in these elections, creating scandals and inciting rumors. Rumors of homosexuality among party members have been used to court sympathy, Lee Teng-hui was hit with a NT$10 million (US$298,000) fine for defamation, and a raid of a private residence seized VCDs critical of the KMT and brought the maker in for questioning.
Trying to quash the voice of anyone who doesn't happen to agree with you smacks of the CCP. It is known as "white terror." Do you see those individuals making noises about "green terror" being dragged in for questioning by the DPP? If they are given even the slightest amount of power on the local government level they will do everything they can not only to reinstate the KMT as lords of the party-state system, but to work with Beijing to bring a new era of "red terror" to Taiwan.
I would suggest that Taiwan's voters, irrespective of whether they support the pan-green or pan-blue camp, think carefully about whether they want this.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Paul Cooper
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS