Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) recently said that issues such as the KMT's disputed assets, party members adding the years they worked for the KMT to their civil-service employment records (to gain pension benefits) and the 18 percent preferential interest rate enjoyed by retired public servants are "the products of the party-state era," stressing that "our country will be in a complete shambles if we continue to look into these issues, for they result from a unique situation."
Ma's remarks are not entirely unreasonable, for any country that has gone through a revolution, become independent or democratized must deal with how to evaluate the previous era. However, a transformed society should avoid rejecting the achievements of the previous era based on what is deemed wrong today, because both the standards for right and wrong, and the value systems of the former and current societies might be totally incommensurable. A lack of shared concepts between different eras may mean that we cannot compare the two and that even understanding the earlier period may be difficult.
However, does this apply to all societies in transition? Is social transition sufficient reason to excuse past crimes? The answer lies in whether a society in transition has reached a point at which its current status has become incommensurable with the past.
If we use present-day criteria to evaluate the performance of the Kangxi emperor of the Qing Dynasty, he looks every inch the dictator. Although he believed that "human life is so important that we cannot ignore it," he did not have the same concept of human rights that is popular today. He was in favor of extracting confessions by means of torture, and the verdict depended on whether the criminal was a relative, a member of the aristocracy or a wise man. His thought-control campaign was never relaxed, and political opponents were often put behind bars without trial and sentenced to death by dismemberment for the flimsiest reasons.
The reason we still believe he was a wise emperor is that we recognize the value systems of the two eras as being completely incommensurable. In an era in which people were treated as the subjects rather than the masters of a nation, an emperor who always reviewed every death sentence with the utmost care fulfilled all demands that era placed on a ruler.
We should apply stricter standards when it comes to former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (
There is really not that much difference between the criminal and civil law of the Republic of China (ROC) of 40 years ago and the laws we have now, and textbooks of the Three Principles of the People back then taught the democratic rule of law, just as it is taught today. Even more importantly, in contrast to the absolute authority of the Chinese Communist Party, which is written into China's Constitution, there is nothing in the ROC Constitution that gave the KMT the right to appropriate state property, or use state funds for the party.
In other words, we live within the same value system as the two Chiangs, and illegal or inappropriate conduct should be treated as such, whether it occurred then or in the present day. Of course, during those times relatives of the ruling family, such as Chiang Ching-kuo's son Chiang Hsiao-wen (蔣孝文), considered themselves to be above the law, and the KMT could blatantly appropriate state property as their own. Political criminals would sometimes disappear suddenly without a trace, as in the case of alleged bank robber Wang Ying-hsien (王迎先). They would be beaten to death in custody as police tried to extract a confession.
These incidents were illegal, and the only reason no one stood up and said as much was that they didn't dare. The two Chiangs were indeed dictators, and there is no comparison between them and the Kangxi emperor: The reason we can say this is precisely because they went against the laws and ethical standards of their own time, which remain the same today. This is still true regardless of the fact that they might not have been as cruel as the Kangxi emperor had been.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has done a very good job of categorizing different periods, and we have become used to referring to the recent past in terms of the end of martial law, the first free elections, and the transition of power from the KMT to the DPP when President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was made head of state, to such an extent that these periods are seen as distinct from each other.
This kind of distinction may well make sense when talking about the Russian revolution or the establishment of the People's Republic of China, but in Taiwan's case, democratization has merely been a process of increasing political freedoms and a change in governing parties.
We may well think our society is very different from the one we had during the martial law period, but in fact 99 percent of the laws we have now were made prior to democratization: Social relations, our value system, our view of history and the distribution of money and power have remained the same.
If there is a difference, it is that we now have the courage to speak up, and I hope that we can use the standards of that era (also the current era's) to seek justice for any illegal behavior that happened at the time. This is a basic requirement. We cannot, we should not, use the party-state as an excuse to obstruct this.
Liang Wen-chieh is a former deputy director of the DPP's policy coordination committee and a doctoral candidate in the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Paul Cooper
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS