Since early this year, foreign investors have poured more money into Taiwan's stock market than any other stock market in Asia, with the exception of Japan's. As of this month, foreign investors have contributed over NT$400 billion (US$11.9 billion) to the nation's stock market. This month alone, the influx of foreign capital into the market has reached more than NT$140 billion, a record high for a single month.
Strangely enough, just a couple of weeks ago the nation's pro-China media was warning the government, quoting foreign financial analysts who argued that if the government did not push ahead with opening the three direct links with China and lifting the investment ceiling for Taiwanese companies in China to 40 percent of their asset value, foreign investors would eventually abandon Taiwan for China. They said that it looked as though the nation would go down the tubes if it insisted on prioritizing its sovereignty over everything else.
In fact, foreign investors have yet to withdraw their capital from Taiwan, even though the government has yet to eliminate restrictions on Taiwanese businessmen investing in China or negotiate with Beijing over regular cross-strait direct flights. On the contrary, foreign investors have been putting more money into Taiwan. Last year, foreign investors injected a total of NT$283.9 billion into the nation's stock market. This year, they have already far exceeded that amount. Interestingly enough, between January and August, foreign investors injected US$11.5 billion into Taiwan's stock market; at the same time they only invested US$800 million in South Korea's stock market.
These statistics indicate that although the media believes the nation's economic outlook is dismal, Taiwan is still a top investment target for foreign investors. Evidently, the pro-China media outlets were ignoring the facts and pursuing their own interests when quoting some foreign investors' criticisms of Taiwan's China policy.
If we analyze the portfolios of foreign investors we find that last year they invested NT$283.9 billion in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC,
The government has yet to totally lift restrictions on chip companies that want to set up plants in China. Despite this, TSMC, the leading player in the industry, is not being ignored by foreign investors. AUO and China Steel have similar characteristics, for they have both kept most of their production lines in Taiwan.
If foreign investors' criteria for selecting investment targets are based on profitability, we have to consider why the companies willing to stay in Taiwan are proving to be more profitable and able to keep up with industry changes.
There are 694 listed companies in Taiwan. Only one or two companies have continued to perform well after relocating to China. Shares of the majority of companies that have moved to China are trading at or below their face value -- not the sort of thing that foreign investors are interested in.
In addition, traditional industries that have been able to stand out are those that face partial bans on expanding into China, Formosa Plastics Group being a good example. Although the Formosa Plastics Group, just like TSMC, has invested a great deal of money in China, the amount accounts for a small proportion of its overall investment in Taiwan, and remains in a controllable range.
In other words, the government's reluctance to allow naphtha cracker plants to set up branches in China has not swayed investor confidence in Formosa Plastics Group, but instead guaranteed a profit.
The major weakness of Taiwanese businessmen working in China is that they have fallen into the "China fever" trap -- a result of a "greater China complex." Company owners have to travel to various regions in China throughout the year rather than focus on their business operations in Taiwan. Meanwhile, jumping onto the China bandwagon leads to lower prices for products, which can place an industry or an enterprises in a disadvantageous position.
In retrospect, the government's decision to restrict wafer foundries from moving to China in 2002 seems like a major factor behind the continued profitability of chip manufacturers such as TSMC, and why foreign investors still regard them as top investment targets.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (
A pro-China Chinese-language newspaper recently ran a headline that said "Foreign companies will abandon Taiwan if the government continues to forbid Taiwanese enterprises from investing in China."
But, contrary to expectations, those forbidden industries have turned out to be foreign investors' favorites.
This all goes to show that Lee's remark was well-founded. After all, foreign companies and media outlets are pursuing own interests and the government should never submit to their will. Rather, it should consider the nation's sustainable development and map out a policy based on the needs of all of the nation's industries.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US