Russian President Vladimir Putin makes an unlikely swinger. Until now, he has been assiduously courting China. He sells Beijing oil and weaponry. Bilateral trade will be worth about US$27 billion this year.
Cold war border disputes have been settled. The two countries recently held unprecedented joint military exercises. And they often act together at the UN on issues such as Iran and Sudan.
Yet risking accusations of infidelity from Beijing, Putin has spent the past three days in Japan, China's old enemy and regional rival and a country with which Russia is technically still at war. He promised to build a pipeline linking Japan to Siberia's oil. He encouraged further investment in Russia. And he was conciliatory over the hot-button issue of the Kurile islands, known in Japan as the Northern Territories, seized by the Soviet Union in 1945 and which Tokyo wants back.
"We will be doing everything possible to solve this problem," Putin said. "We are fully determined to work to solve all the issues we face." He even listened with apparent equanimity as Japan's Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi urged Russia to handle weapons exports to China "in a careful manner."
Putin's two-timing in Tokyo was all the more remarkable given Japan's relative weakness, said Christopher Hughes, a regional expert at the University of Warwick.
"At the end of the Cold War, Russia was on the slide and Japan was on the up. But the tables have turned," he said.
"Japan faces a major economic rival in China that to some extent is outplaying Japan in regional diplomacy and energy acquisition. It needs another big power to balance against China alongside its alliance with the US That's why it's put the islands dispute on the back-burner."
Similar calculations may lie behind Putin's placatory stance. He obtained specific rewards, such as Japanese backing for Moscow's bid for membership of the WTO. But longer-term concerns about becoming dependent on China's markets or being victimized by its strategic designs may also have prompted him to hedge his bets.
"Russia is very weak in the Far East. It has almost no military presence there," Hughes said.
Some analysts suggest resource-rich, thinly populated Siberia could one day prove a tempting target for expanding China.
Similar worries also help explain regionally unloved Japan's tightening embrace of the US, underscored by the visit of US President George W. Bush last week. Undecided whether China's rise is a threat or an opportunity, uneasy over its threats against Taiwan and deeply wary of North Korea, Washington is reinforcing relationships across Asia, notably with India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Vietnam and Mongolia.
But Japan remains the linchpin of its regional strategy and, increasingly, of its forward defense. Bush called it "a vital relationship."
Plans to station a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier taskforce, operational commands, and the US Army 1st Corps' rapid reaction force in Japan were agreed last month.
"The security environment in the western Pacific increasingly requires that the US Navy station the most capable ships in forward-deployed positions," Admiral James Kelly said. "This posture brings ... the greatest amount of striking power, if necessary, in the timeliest manner to any regional crisis."
Like its embrace of Russia, US advances carry risks for Japan. It has already been sucked into Washington's wider agenda in Iraq, Afghanistan and the "war on terror." US bases and missile sales remain controversial. And the assertiveness encouraged by Washington is fueling nationalist sentiment. But its position on the edge of a world increasingly dominated by Beijing is lonely.
"We need the US," one diplomat said. "What can we do? We have no choice."
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US