Election campaigns are all about setting the agenda, framing the debate, damage control and positive or negative campaigning. There is more to winning a poll than merely attacking the opposition. The only way to come out of a campaign alive is to tell the truth, take the hits and move on.
The Dec. 3 local elections are a manifestation of all the aforementioned campaign elements.
Ever since the scandal involving the former deputy secretary-general of the Presidential Office, Chen Che-nan (陳哲男), made the headlines, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government have been conducting crisis management to minimize the impact of the scandal on the government's image and in the polls.
In addition to exerting more internal party discipline and taking full responsibility for Chen's misconduct, the president and DPP leaders have attempted to reorient the focus of campaign back to policy by reframing the debate. The reform of the 18 percent interest rate for retired teachers, public servants and military officials demonstrated the government's strong will to implement one of the Six Great Reforms the president outlined during his Double Ten National Day Address.
From a strategic point of view, distracting public attention from the scandal by focusing on other, larger items of the reform agenda is the best way for the DPP to survive the scandal. A campaign cannot win if it is based solely on negative messages.
It is only natural that some media groups and the pan-blue opposition will take advantage of the DPP's mistakes to sabotage the government's image. Negative campaigns have their place, but they do not form the essential element of a winning campaign. They can sometimes be tactical tools to gain an advantage. But most of the time, negatives will only work once you've laid out an alternative vision for your campaign through positive ads and reform-minded determination.
In addition to spreading more unverified rumors against the government, the pan-blue camp has so far failed to prove they can do better than the DPP. Campaigns start with competing messages. The key to winning any race is to come up with an positive message that outlasts your opponents' message. It is the inability to understand this simple, straightforward point that will cause the public to lose more trust in the pan-blue alliance.
The reform of the pension system is the best example of turning a negative campaign into a positive competition. Since last week, the president and the DPP have put the reform of public-service pensions on top of their campaign priorities in the name of promoting "social justice and eliminating class division."
The KMT's abuse of the pension system has become a DPP target. For example, they accused Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), KMT Deputy Chairman Kuan Chung (關中) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) of including their service in the KMT as part of their calculations for their civil-service pensions. The DPP's rebuttal is effective because it touches upon the general welfare of voters.
Rebuttal is crucial. Rebuttals usually defeat attacks. A rebuttal not only wipes out the impact of the original negative attack, but it damages the credibility of the candidate who launched the attack and makes it harder for him to try again. The president and his government need rebuttals and counterpunches to rejuvenate their campaign.
The crossfire on pension reform is helping to lead the campaign back onto the right track. The government should take the initiative to push for reform and to convince voters that the pursuit of social justice, healthy development and the enhancement of national security constitutes the key to Taiwan's future development.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS