To US President George W. Bush:
On the eve of your visit to China, we, the undersigned representatives of Taiwanese-American organizations, appeal to you to reaffirm the US' support for freedom and democracy in Taiwan. In your upcoming meetings with the Chinese leaders, please remind them that it has long been US policy that the future of Taiwan be resolved peacefully and with the expressed consent of the Taiwanese people.
You have been advocating the spread of democracy throughout the world. We applaud your dedication to this core American value. Taiwan has achieved its democracy through sweat and tears. It is clearly in the US' interests to protect and nurture this hard-won democracy. Therefore we implore you to let the Taiwanese people exercise their democratic right in determining their destiny. We urge you to refrain from expressing non-support for Taiwan independence.
To say that the US does not support Taiwan independence risks precluding de jure independence as an option for the future of Taiwan. Taiwan has been a de facto independent country for 60 years. Taiwan has never been ruled by the People's Republic of China.
A survey in Taiwan last year found that 62 percent of the respondents said they were Taiwanese. A mere 19 percent identified themselves as Chinese. Given free choice, the people of Taiwan would most likely vote for de jure independence.
The best way to foster democracy is to create an environment in which the people's will can be freely expressed.
In the case of Taiwan, the 700 Chinese missiles targeting the nation produce a coercive rather than conducive environment for the exercise of democracy. These missiles also gravely threaten the status quo that you have been so eager to preserve. We recommend that, in your negotiations with the Chinese leaders, you insist that these offensive weapons be dismantled.
In April 2001, you stated that the US would do whatever necessary to help Taiwan defend itself. We are grateful for your strong commitment to the safety and security of Taiwan. We trust that on your China trip, you will not give in to Chinese demands to diminish Taiwan's status as a free and democratic nation or as a full and equal member of the international community.
Fred Baehner
American Taiwan Society
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath