It is a disgrace that this country can't fly its own national flag at international events that it hosts.
Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Cases in point: the Asian Short Track Speed Skating championship, which was held on Nov. 5 and Nov. 6 at the new Taipei Little Dome, the International Auto Gymkhana and the Sixth Asian Youth Judo Championship which took place over the weekend. At all of these events, ROC flags were nowhere to be found. What's more, spectators were banned from bringing their own ROC flags to these events. Yet all the while, the flag of the People's Republic of China was on display.
We can't help but wonder about all the people who so fervently declared their love for the ROC at the mass pan-blue protests after last year's presidential election. Where did they all go? What happened to all the people who were so hypersensitive whenever someone dared to criticize the ROC flag?
Here we are, just a year and a half later, and despite the national humiliation at the Taipei Little Dome, we haven't heard the flag-lovers breathe a word of protest. The same fanatical partisans who rushed to Ketagelan Boulevard with ROC flags in hand dare not complain that their beloved flag has been banned at Taipei Little Dome -- while that of communist China flies high. Ma, who waxed patriotic about Taiwan's sovereign claim over the Diaoyutais (釣魚台), can't even uphold the nation's dignity at an event his own city hosts.
Attempting to defend his lame actions, Ma said that events held at the Taipei Little Dome were privately organized, and that the Taipei City Government had nothing to do with them except for leasing the venue.
Ma added that all international games held in Taipei must follow the rules set by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which in a 1981 agreement stated that in return for being allowed to participate in international sporting events, the nation's sports teams must use the name "Chinese Taipei," and fly the "Chinese Taipei Olympic flag," and may not display the national flag or play the national anthem.
But if Ma really loves the ROC so much, couldn't he at least put up a fight against China's bullying? Are there no ways for him to try to maintain the country's national dignity, and the dignity of its flag?
Granted, under the IOC agreement, ROC flags aren't allowed to be displayed inside the stadium. But Ma could have put signs that read "Under Protest" at the entrances to the Little Dome. He could have found creative ways to maintain the country's dignity at international events, while letting such events proceed. But he chose not to.
In comparison with the pan-blues, who have stayed shamefully mute, pan-green politicians have lambasted Ma for humiliating the nation and corroding its sovereignty. Did the pan-greens have a change of heart and suddenly fall in love with the ROC flag? We think not. Rather, pan-greens saw the country's very dignity and autonomy at stake.
The furor over the national flag has made clear to all the rank hypocrisy of supposedly "patriotic" pan-blues. It is also a timely reminder of the need to rewrite the Constitution, so that Taiwan can become a normal country whose dignity is respected by all.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS