The legislature's finance committee last week passed the first reading of amendments to the Securities and Exchange Law (證券交易法), which aims to introduce independent board directors into the business world to strengthen corporate governance. If legislators request no further discussion of the amendments, the draft revisions will soon be subject to a second reading and may pass their final review during this legislative session.
The amendments were initiated in response to a series of high profile corporate scandals and accounting abuses that began last year at listed companies including Procomp Informatics Co (
Take the Procomp Informatics case. The firm filed a restructuring plan with a local district court after defaulting on corporate bond payments in June last year. But it was later found to have a case to answer for over a lack of capital, insider trading allegations and false financial reports. The scandal highlighted the need for independent directors on company boards -- Procomp's board only included family members and close friends of its chairwoman -- and greater accountability among certified accountants.
The draft amendments stipulate that the Financial Supervisory Commission may demand that listed companies -- trading on the Taiwan Stock Exchange or the over-the-counter GreTai Securities Market -- reserve at least two seats or no less than one-fifth of the total board for independent directors. Additionally, the draft amendments require these directors to sit on the company's audit committee.
To further protect the interests of shareholders and, where appropriate, other stakeholders, the proposed legislation also requires certified public accountants to be held legally accountable for ensuring the accuracy of listed companies' financial reports that they have certified, unless they can prove in cases of fraud that they have fulfilled their duties and had no prior knowledge of illegal conduct.
While the law aims to eventually have independent directors make up a substantial majority of seats on a board, the amendments only require Taiwan's firms to have at least one-fifth of all seats occupied by independent directors, fewer than the US' minimum of one-half and Japan's minimum of one-third.
But it is encouraging to see the government has started to make an effort to modernize company laws and enhance corporate governance.
The proposed legislation, if approved, will take effect on Jan. 1, 2007, and will be implemented in stages across various business sectors. Since the requirements of this important legislation are new to many of Taiwan's companies -- the introduction of independent directors in particular -- the government should provide corporate governance education to both investors and company management, thereby enabling them to know more about the role of independent representatives as well as why it is important that these directors have the ability to challenge management decisions.
The draft legislation takes important steps toward reforming corporate governance in this country, and may change the way business is conducted in Taiwan for the better. But it should be said that ensuring compliance with the law is just a first step; for better corporate governance and development, it is still the responsibility of management and employees to act honestly and with integrity. People always play a more important role in any system of checks and balances.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95