Much discussion about the recent TVBS controversy has ignored the distinctions between media values, freedom of the press, politics and the law.
The TVBS storm started with the revelation of a photograph. It is the duty of the media to reveal misconduct and this attempt at doing so should be applauded. The photograph alone, however, is not enough to prove conclusively any misconduct by the people shown.
Guests on TV shows have gone too far in drawing conclusions concerning who is implicated. On such occasions, the media should act as gatekeepers and work to offer a balanced picture, in order to maintain their neutrality. They should also strive to maintain their role as observers instead of goading participants or jumping in to stir things up.
An opinion voiced by a guest on a TV show falls within the scope of freedom of speech. But when that information is disseminated by a media outlet it becomes protected by the freedom of the press. We all enjoy freedom of speech, but only those privileged groups who have the power to use the media are protected by freedom of the press. They often operate media outlets and hold high social positions. As a result, placing press freedom before all else simply becomes protection of media hegemony.
Furthermore, the Broadcasting and Television Law (
It is inappropriate for TVBS to say that such an investigation cannot be carried out since the broadcasting license has already been issued. Intervention is possible whenever illegal actions are discovered. After all, a drug addict cannot say that, "I've been taking drugs for years. You didn't investigate me before, so you cannot investigate me now."
TVBS also says that its license can only be withdrawn following the establishment of the national communications commission. Until the commission is established, however, the GIO remains the agency in charge. Not taking action would be tantamount to dereliction of duty.
The question of whether or not TVBS has broken the law should be determined by the authorities. In future, there will also be other ways to obtain judicial remedy. Opposition leaders and legislators join the calls against the GIO because they smell blood. Calls for street protests and recalling the president if TVBS' license is cancelled is simply a matter of letting political interests take precedence over the law.
In the same way, President Chen Shui-bian's (
The government must not suppress the media. That would mark a return to authoritarian politics. For their part, politicians and the media must not set a bad example by letting their disregard for the law take precedence over the law itself.
The revelation of misconduct must not turn into sentencing via the media, and freedom of the press must not be allowed to override all else. To enjoy freedom of the press, we must first take a square look at social responsibility.
Cheng Tzu-leong is a professor in the department of advertising at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from